IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v48y1972i4p561-569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Produced Inputs and their Implications for Trade Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Murray C. Kemp
  • Yasdo Uekawa

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Murray C. Kemp & Yasdo Uekawa, 1972. "Produced Inputs and their Implications for Trade Theory," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 48(4), pages 561-569, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:48:y:1972:i:4:p:561-569
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1972.tb00401.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1972.tb00401.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1972.tb00401.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raveendra N. Batra & Prasanta K. Pattanaik, 1971. "Economic Growth, Intermediate Products, and the Terms of Trade," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 225-237, May.
    2. Khang, Chulsoon, 1971. "An isovalue locus involving intermediate goods and its applications to the pure theory of international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 315-325, August.
    3. Ronald Findlay & Harry Grubert, 1959. "Factor Intensities, Technological Progress, And The Terms Of Trade," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 111-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Murray C. Kemp, 1975. "A Note on Technical Improvements, Outputs and the Distribution of Income," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 51(3), pages 333-338, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murray C. Kemp, 1975. "A Note on Technical Improvements, Outputs and the Distribution of Income," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 51(3), pages 333-338, September.
    2. Sabine Engelmann, 2014. "International trade, technological change and wage inequality in the UK economy," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(2), pages 223-246, May.
    3. Jonathan E. Haskel, 2000. "Trade and Labor Approaches to Wage Inequality," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), pages 397-408, August.
    4. Todd Sanderson & Fredoun Z. Ahmadi‐Esfahani, 2009. "Testing Comparative Advantage in Australian Broadacre Agriculture Under Climate Change: Theoretical and Empirical Models," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 346-354, December.
    5. John S. Chipman, 1970. "Induced Technical Change and Patterns of International Trade," NBER Chapters, in: The Technology Factor in International Trade, pages 95-142, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Chun‐Yan Kuo, 1977. "Intermediate Products and the Two‐Sector Growth Model in an Open Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 53(1), pages 96-109, March.
    7. Richard A. Brecher & Zhihao Yu, 2021. "Trade-Induced Reduction In Unemployment Of A High-Wage Economy: A Minimum-Wage Model With Country-Specific Technology," Carleton Economic Papers 21-04, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    8. Jonathan E. Haskel & Matthew J. Slaughter, 1998. "Does the Sector Bias of Skill-Biased Technical Change Explain Changing Wage Inequality?," NBER Working Papers 6565, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Becker, Daniel Thomas & Gundlach, Erich, 2006. "Notes on factor price equality and biased technical change in a two-cone trade model," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 68, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    10. Gundlach, Erich & de Vaal, Albert, 2012. "Technology differences in empirical studies of international trade," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 18-20.
    11. R. E. Baldwin & G. G. Cain, "undated". "Shifts in U.S. Relative Wages: The Role of Trade, Technology, and Factor Endowments," Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Papers 1132-97, University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty.
    12. Ronald Findlay & Ronald W. Jones, 2018. "Factor Bias and Technical Progress," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: International Trade Theory and Competitive Models Features, Values, and Criticisms, chapter 11, pages 167-173, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Jonathan E. Haskel & Matthew J. Slaughter, 2003. "Have Falling Tariffs and Transportation Costs Raised US Wage Inequality?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 630-650, September.
    14. Davis, Donald R., 1998. "Technology, unemployment, and relative wages in a global economy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1613-1633, November.
    15. Grossman, Gene M. & Helpman, Elhanan, 1995. "Technology and trade," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 25, pages 1279-1337, Elsevier.
    16. Robert Stehrer, 2010. "The effects of factor and sector biased technical change revisited," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 65-94, February.
    17. L Edwards & A Behar, 2006. "Trade Liberalisation and Labour Demand within South African Manufacturing Firms," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 127-146, August.
    18. Haskel, Jonathan & Slaughter, Matthew J, 2001. "Trade, Technology and U.K. Wage Inequality," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(468), pages 163-187, January.
    19. Morrow, Peter M., 2010. "Ricardian-Heckscher-Ohlin comparative advantage: Theory and evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 137-151, November.
    20. W. Erwin Diewert, 1980. "Aggregation Problems in the Measurement of Capital," NBER Chapters, in: The Measurement of Capital, pages 433-538, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:48:y:1972:i:4:p:561-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.