IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecanth/v5y2018i1p20-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sucre indigène and sucre colonial: Reconsidering the splitting of the French national sugar market, 1800–1860

Author

Listed:
  • Jonna M. Yarrington

Abstract

In the early 1800s, the French beet sugar industry was established to provide sugar autarky for France. From the beginning, it competed with French Caribbean cane sugar. Over sixty years, the two complexes produced their own blocs that coexisted and split the French national sugar market, both claiming rights to governmental protection. This article argues that reconsidering the sugar question provides evidence for a shift in the political–economic concept of colony, drawing on pamphlets from the 1830s and 1840s as well as relevant secondary historiography. The blocs struggled over definitions of protection, indemnity, and, ultimately, the relationship of colony and nation. The splitting of the market thus amounted to a rupture of colonies from metropole, which provides an underplayed colonial dimension to economic liberalization and a history of liberal precepts quietly at work in the developing rift. The question des sucres bears witness to a fraught disintegration—symbolic, political, and economic—of the oldest French colonies from the nation that had built them.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonna M. Yarrington, 2018. "Sucre indigène and sucre colonial: Reconsidering the splitting of the French national sugar market, 1800–1860," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 20-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:20-31
    DOI: 10.1002/sea2.12099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sea2.12099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kindleberger, C. P., 1975. "The Rise of Free Trade in Western Europe, 1820–1875," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 20-55, March.
    2. Anna Bezanson, 1922. "The Early Use of the Term Industrial Revolution," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 36(2), pages 343-349.
    3. Crouzet, François, 1964. "Wars, Blockade, and Economic Change in Europe, 1792–1815," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 567-588, December.
    4. Paul Butel, 1989. "Succès et déclin du commerce colonial français, de la Révolution à la Restauration," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(6), pages 1079-1096.
    5. White, Eugene N., 2001. "Making the French pay: The costs and consequences of the Napoleonic reparations," European Review of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 337-365, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pravin Krishna & Devashish Mitra, 2016. "Reciprocated unilateralism in trade policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Trade Policy Theory, Evidence and Applications, chapter 3, pages 37-63, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Joost Veenstra & Herman de Jong, 2015. "A Tale of Two Tails: Plant Size Variation and Comparative Labor Productivity in U.S. and German Manufacturing in the Early 20th Century," CEH Discussion Papers 032, Centre for Economic History, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    3. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2017. "Political economy of trade protection and liberalization: in search of agency-based and holistic framework of policy change," MPRA Paper 79504, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Fremdling, R., 1999. "Historical Precedents of Global Markets," Papers gd-43, Groningen State, Institute of Economic Research-.
    5. Kim Oosterlinck & Loredana Ureche-Rangau & Jacques-Marie Vaslin, 2013. "Waterloo: a Godsend for French Public Finances?," Working Papers 0041, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    6. Ritschl, Albrecht & Straumann, Tobias, 2009. "Business cycles and economic policy, 1914-1945: a survey," Economic History Working Papers 22402, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    7. Chilosi, David & Murphy, Tommy E. & Studer, Roman & Tunçer, A. Coşkun, 2013. "Europe's many integrations: Geography and grain markets, 1620–1913," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 46-68.
    8. repec:dgr:rugggd:199943 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Riva, Angelo & White, Eugene N., 2011. "Danger on the exchange: How counterparty risk was managed on the Paris exchange in the nineteenth century," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 478-493.
    10. Zissimos, Ben, 2017. "A theory of trade policy under dictatorship and democratization," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 85-101.
    11. Kevin H. O'Rourke, Leandro Prados de la Escosura and Guilllaume Daudin, 2008. "Trade and Empire, 1700-1870," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp249, IIIS.
    12. Kym Anderson & Gordon Rausser & Johan Swinnen, 2013. "Political Economy of Public Policies: Insights from Distortions to Agricultural and Food Markets," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(2), pages 423-477, June.
    13. Mark Harrison, 2016. "Myths of the Great War," Studies in Economic History, in: Jari Eloranta & Eric Golson & Andrei Markevich & Nikolaus Wolf (ed.), Economic History of Warfare and State Formation, pages 135-158, Springer.
    14. Vincent Bignon & Pierre Sicsic, 2022. "Quelles leçons de l’histoire ? ou comment faire face aux fortes augmentations de dette publique ?," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(2), pages 41-66.
    15. Elise S. Brezis, 2020. "Trade Policy and National Identity: Why Keynes Was Opposed to Protectionist Policies?," Working Papers 2020-02, Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics.
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/670 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Armand M. Leroi & Ben Lambert & Matthias Mauch & Marina Papadopoulou & Sophia Ananiadou & Staffan I. Lindberg & Patrik Lindenfors, 2020. "On revolutions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/670 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Takatsuka, Hajime & Zeng, Dao-Zhi, 2012. "Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 308-325.
    20. Klingenberg, Cristina Orsolin & Borges, Marco Antônio Viana & Antunes, José Antônio do Vale, 2022. "Industry 4.0: What makes it a revolution? A historical framework to understand the phenomenon," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    21. Réka Juhász, 2014. "Temporary Protection and Technology Adoption: Evidence from the Napoleonic Blockade," CEP Discussion Papers dp1322, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    22. François Crouzet, 2003. "The historiography of French economic growth in the nineteenth century," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 56(2), pages 215-242, May.
    23. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/6149 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Greif, Gavin, 2022. "Merchants, proto-firms, and the German industrialization: the commercial determinants of nineteenth century town growth," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113346, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:20-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2330-4847 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.