IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v34y2016i1p83-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Data on a Closed Shop? Assessing the potential of transparency initiatives with a focus on efforts to strengthen capacity development support

Author

Listed:
  • Niels Keijzer

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="dpr12146-abs-0001"> Despite strong political commitment, actual gains in improving accountability in development co-operation have been limited. Main reasons for this include the low level of transparency and high number of actors, as well as the limitations of the self-reported and input-oriented OECD reporting system. Efforts through the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) and related transparency initiatives are ill-equipped to change this given their decision to adhere to the same system. This article uses the specific area of support to capacity development to illustrate this. While further disaggregation of reporting on technical co-operation could respond to a transparency gap, overcoming the accountability gap requires moving beyond promoting ‘supply-side’ reform and re-engaging in efforts to promote collective action.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Keijzer, 2016. "Open Data on a Closed Shop? Assessing the potential of transparency initiatives with a focus on efforts to strengthen capacity development support," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(1), pages 83-100, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:34:y:2016:i:1:p:83-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/dpr.2016.34.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elisabeth Paul, 2015. "Performance-Based Aid: Why It Will Probably Not Meet Its Promises," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 33(3), pages 313-323, May.
    2. R. Renard & D. Cassimon, 2003. "The Quality of Aid Statistics What We Should Be Measuring, and Why We Don’t," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(4), pages 652-674.
    3. Richard Manning, 2012. "Aid as a Second-Best Solution: Seven Problems of Effectiveness and How to Tackle Them," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-024, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Faust, Jörg & Ziaja, Sebastian, 2012. "German aid allocation and partner country selection: development-orientation, self-interests and path dependency," IDOS Discussion Papers 7/2012, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Rosalind Eyben, 2013. "Struggles in Paris: The DAC and the Purposes of Development Aid," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 25(1), pages 78-91, February.
    6. Lindsay Whitfield, 2012. "How Countries Become Rich and Reduce Poverty: A Review of Heterodox Explanations of Economic Development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 30(3), pages 239-260, May.
    7. repec:unu:wpaper:wp2012-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Keijzer, Niels, 2014. "Reforming the hand that feeds you? Managing capacity development support in Cambodia and Malawi," IDOS Discussion Papers 20/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    9. Manning, Richard, 2012. "Aid as a Second-Best Solution : Seven Problems of Effectiveness and How to Tackle Them," WIDER Working Paper Series 024, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kablan P. Kacou & Lavagnon A. Ika & Lauchlan T. Munro, 2022. "Fifty years of capacity building: Taking stock and moving research forward," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(4), pages 215-232, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Addison, Tony & Singhal, Saurabh & Tarp, Finn, 2013. "Aid to Africa: The Changing Context," WIDER Working Paper Series 144, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Faheem Jehangir Khan, 2016. "The Aid Policy Network in Pakistan: An Actor-Network Analysis," PIDE-Working Papers 2016:140, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    3. Janus, Heiner & Keijzer, Niels, 2015. "Big results now? Emerging lessons from results-based aid in Tanzania," IDOS Discussion Papers 4/2015, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Robert Darko Osei & Freda Asem & George Domfe, 2013. "The Political Economy Dimensions of Macroeconomic Management of Aid in Ghana," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-106, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Faheem Jehangir Khan, 2017. "Opening the Black Box: Managing the Aid Policy Process in Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2017:149, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    6. Asem, Freda & Domfe, George & Osei, Robert, 2013. "The Political Economy Dimensions of Macroeconomic Management of Aid in Ghana," WIDER Working Paper Series 106, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Tony Addison & Saurabh Singhal & Finn Tarp, 2013. "Aid to Africa: the Changing Context," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-144, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Larrú, José María, 2013. "The developmental contribution of the Offset Agreements: the case of Colombia," MPRA Paper 51456, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Faheem Jehangir Khan, 2017. "Opening the Black Box: Managing the Aid Policy Process in Pakistan," Working Papers id:12179, eSocialSciences.
    10. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    11. HEPP, Ralf, 2010. "CONSEQUENCES OF DEBT RELIEF INITIATIVES IN THE 1990s," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 10(1).
    12. Emma Mawdsley & Warwick E. Murray & John Overton & Regina Scheyvens & Glenn Banks, 2018. "Exporting stimulus and “shared prosperity†: Reinventing foreign aid for a retroliberal era," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 25-43, March.
    13. Silvia Marchesi & Alessandro Missale, 2004. "What does motivate lending and aid to the HIPCs?," Development Working Papers 189, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    14. Arild Angelsen, 2017. "REDD+ as Result-based Aid: General Lessons and Bilateral Agreements of Norway," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 237-264, May.
    15. Hans Grinsted Jensen & Nick Vink & Ron Sandrey, 2014. "The rise of Brazilian agriculture: some lessons for South Africa," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 79-100, September.
    16. Matthew Dornan, 2017. "How new is the ‘new’ conditionality? Recipient perspectives on aid, country ownership and policy reform," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 46-63, July.
    17. Gugerty, Mary Kay & Mitchell, George E. & Santamarina, Francisco J., 2021. "Discourses of evaluation: Institutional logics and organizational practices among international development agencies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Heidi Gjertsen & Theodore Groves & David A Miller & Eduard Niesten & Dale Squires & Joel Watson, 2021. "Conservation Agreements: Relational Contracts with Endogenous Monitoring [“Toward a Theory of Discounted Repeated Games with Imperfect Monitoring]," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 1-40.
    19. Rudolph, Alexandra, 2017. "The concept of SDG-sensitive development cooperation: implications for OECD-DAC members," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    20. berlage, Lodewijk & cassimon, Danny & dreze, Jacques & Reding, Paul, 2003. "Prospective Aid and Indebtedness Relief: A Proposal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1635-1654, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:34:y:2016:i:1:p:83-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.