IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v69y2021i2p225-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Canadian pork industry and COVID‐19: A year of resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Ken McEwan
  • Lynn Marchand
  • Max Zongyuan Shang

Abstract

While COVID‐19 had the potential to be extremely disruptive to the Canadian pork supply chain, the sector showed resiliency by adjusting to market changes to ensure industry continuation. Unlike other non‐agricultural firms that were mandated to close at times, the pork sector was deemed an essential service and allowed to continue operating throughout the pandemic. Evidence of this resiliency is seen in three main ways. First, market access to the United States was maintained for both live pigs and pork exports. Second, Canada not only maintained market share in global pork exports, but it also actually increased shipments because of strong demand from China caused by African swine fever. Third, the challenges of processing plant closures and labour shortages were overcome in a variety of ways including increasing interprovincial shipments and increasing live pig exports to the United States. Pork consumption on a per capita basis continued the historical downward trend, and it is expected that consumers will return to their normal consumption patterns (e.g., dining at restaurants) despite job losses. At the meat processing level, it is anticipated that there will be an acceleration in the process to automate. Bien que le COVID‐19 ait le potentiel de perturber considérablement la chaîne d'approvisionnement du porc canadien, le secteur a fait preuve de résilience en s'adaptant aux changements du marché pour assurer la continuité de l'industrie. Contrairement à d'autres entreprises non agricoles qui ont reçu l'ordre de fermer, le secteur porcin a été considéré comme un service essentiel et a pu continuer à fonctionner tout au long de la pandémie. La preuve de cette résilience est perçue de trois manières principales. Premièrement, l'accès aux marchés des États‐Unis a été maintenu tant pour les porcs vivants que pour les exportations de porc. Deuxièmement, le Canada a non seulement maintenu sa part de marché dans les exportations mondiales de porc, mais il a également augmenté ses expéditions en raison de la forte demande de la Chine causée par la peste porcine africaine. Troisièmement, les défis liés aux fermetures d'usines de transformation et aux pénuries de main‐d'œuvre ont été surmontés de diverses manières, notamment en augmentant les expéditions interprovinciales et en augmentant les exportations de porcs vivants vers les États‐Unis. La consommation de porc par habitant a poursuivi sa tendance à la baisse historique et on s'attend à ce que les consommateurs reviennent à leurs habitudes de consommation normales (e.g., manger au restaurant) malgré les pertes d'emplois. Au niveau de la transformation de la viande, on s'attend à une accélération du processus d'automatisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken McEwan & Lynn Marchand & Max Zongyuan Shang, 2021. "The Canadian pork industry and COVID‐19: A year of resilience," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(2), pages 225-232, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:69:y:2021:i:2:p:225-232
    DOI: 10.1111/cjag.12276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cjag.12276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayson L. Lusk & Glynn T. Tonsor & Lee L. Schulz, 2021. "Beef and Pork Marketing Margins and Price Spreads during COVID‐19," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 4-23, March.
    2. Haley, Mildred & Gale, Fred, 2020. "African Swine Fever Shrinks Pork Production in China, Swells Demand for Imported Pork," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 0(01), February.
    3. Dermot J. Hayes & Lee L. Schulz & Chad E. Hart & Keri L. Jacobs, 2021. "A descriptive analysis of the COVID‐19 impacts on U.S. pork, turkey, and egg markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 122-141, January.
    4. Yubin Wang & Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang, 2020. "COVID-19, supply chain disruption and China’s hog market: a dynamic analysis," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 427-443, June.
    5. Xiaohua Yu & Chang Liu & Hanjie Wang & Jan-Henning Feil, 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 on food prices in China: evidence of four major food products from Beijing, Shandong and Hubei Provinces," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 445-458, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianqing Ruan & Qingwen Cai & Songqing Jin, 2021. "Impact of COVID‐19 and Nationwide Lockdowns on Vegetable Prices: Evidence from Wholesale Markets in China," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(5), pages 1574-1594, October.
    2. Tao Lian & Shamsheer ul Haq & Pomi Shahbaz & Lei Zhao & Muhammad Nadeem & Babar Aziz, 2022. "Changing Food Patterns during the Pandemic: Exploring the Role of Household Dynamics and Income Stabilization Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Padilla, Samantha & Schulz, Lee L. & Vaiknoras, Kate & MacLachlan, Matthew, 2021. "COVID-19 Working Paper: Changes in Regional Hog Slaughter During COVID-19," USDA Miscellaneous 316501, United States Department of Agriculture.
    4. Mindy L. Mallory, 2021. "Impact of COVID‐19 on Medium‐Term Export Prospects for Soybeans, Corn, Beef, Pork, and Poultry," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 292-303, March.
    5. Erdal Erol & Sayed H. Saghaian, 2022. "The COVID-19 Pandemic and Dynamics of Price Adjustment in the U.S. Beef Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Jinyang Cai & Yu Hong & Meifang Zhou & Ruifa Hu & Fengxiang Ding, 2023. "Farmer field school participation and exit decisions in hog production: A case study from Beijing," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 549-563, March.
    7. Kalle Hirvonen & Bart Minten & Belay Mohammed & Seneshaw Tamru, 2021. "Food prices and marketing margins during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from vegetable value chains in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(3), pages 407-421, May.
    8. Taiyang Zhong & Jonathan Crush & Zhenzhong Si & Steffanie Scott, 2022. "Emergency food supplies and food security in Wuhan and Nanjing, China, during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from a field survey," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(3), May.
    9. Gao Tianming & Vasilii Erokhin & Aleksandr Arskiy & Mikail Khudzhatov, 2021. "Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected Maritime Connectivity? An Estimation for China and the Polar Silk Road Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-39, March.
    10. Meilin Ma & Jayson L. Lusk, 2022. "Concentration and Resilience in the US Meat Supply Chains," NBER Chapters, in: Risks in Agricultural Supply Chains, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Bedru B. Balana & Adebayo Ogunniyi & Motunrayo Oyeyemi & Adetunji Fasoranti & Hyacinth Edeh & Kwaw Andam, 2023. "COVID-19, food insecurity and dietary diversity of households: Survey evidence from Nigeria," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(1), pages 219-241, February.
    12. Jayson Beckman & Amanda M. Countryman, 2021. "The Importance of Agriculture in the Economy: Impacts from COVID‐19," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(5), pages 1595-1611, October.
    13. A. Ford Ramsey & Barry Goodwin & Mildred Haley, 2021. "Labor Dynamics and Supply Chain Disruption in Food Manufacturing," NBER Chapters, in: Risks in Agricultural Supply Chains, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Christopher C. Pudenz & Lee L. Schulz, 2022. "Multi-plant Coordination in the US Beef Packing Industry," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 21-wp630, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    15. Zesen Qian & Lingran Yuan & Shuo Wang & Qizheng Zhang & Binlei Gong, 2021. "Epidemics, Convergence, and Common Prosperity: Evidence from China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 29(6), pages 117-138, November.
    16. Nan Li & Muzi Chen & Difang Huang, 2022. "How Do Logistics Disruptions Affect Rural Households? Evidence from COVID-19 in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Dinggao Liu & Zhenpeng Tang & Yi Cai, 2022. "A Hybrid Model for China’s Soybean Spot Price Prediction by Integrating CEEMDAN with Fuzzy Entropy Clustering and CNN-GRU-Attention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Urak, Faruk & Bilgic, Abdulbaki & Florkowski, Wojciech J., 2023. "The Covid-19 pandemic, Russia-Ukraine War, and Price Uncertainty of Staples: An Application of the VECM-Asymmetric GARCH-M BEKK Method," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335748, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Andrew Muhammad & Stephen A. Smith & Jason H. Grant, 2022. "Can China meet its purchase obligations under the Phase One Trade Agreement?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1393-1408, September.
    20. Peter B. Dixon & Maureen T. Rimmer, 2021. "Who will pay for improved health standards in U.S. meat-processing plants? Simulation results from the USAGE model," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-314, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:69:y:2021:i:2:p:225-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.