IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v9y1999i19p3-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Now And The Future

Author

Listed:
  • JANE BAXTER
  • WAI FONG CHUA

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Baxter & Wai Fong Chua, 1999. "Now And The Future," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(19), pages 3-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:9:y:1999:i:19:p:3-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.1999.tb00112.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morris, Timothy & Empson, Laura, 1998. "Organisation and expertise: An exploration of knowledge bases and the management of accounting and consulting firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 609-624.
    2. Heine Thorsgaard Larsen & Per Nikolaj D. Bukh & Jan Mouritsen, 1999. "Intellectual Capital Statements and Knowledge Management: ‘Measuring’, ‘Reporting’, ‘Acting’," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(19), pages 15-26, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Namrata Malhotra & Timothy Morris, 2009. "Heterogeneity in Professional Service Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 895-922, September.
    2. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    3. Marja Toivonen, 2010. "Different Types of Innovation Processes in Services and their Organisational Implications," Chapters, in: Faïz Gallouj & Faridah Djellal (ed.), The Handbook of Innovation and Services, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Rita Lamboglia & Daniela Mancini, 2021. "The relationship between auditors’ human capital attributes and the assessment of the control environment," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1211-1239, December.
    5. Ye, Kangtao & Cheng, Yingli & Gao, Jingyu, 2014. "How individual auditor characteristics impact the likelihood of audit failure: Evidence from China," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 394-401.
    6. Noronha, Teresa, 2013. "KIBS in Peripheral Regions: Major Outlines," Spatial and Organizational Dynamics Discussion Papers 2013-4, CIEO-Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve.
    7. Miguel Pina e Cunha, 2002. ""The best place to be": managing employee loyalty in a knowledge-intensive company," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp409, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    8. Kris Hoang & Steven E. Salterio & Jim Sylph, 2018. "Barriers to Transferring Auditing Research to Standard Setters," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 427-452, September.
    9. Michael Gibbins & Arnold M. Wright, 1999. "Expertise and Knowledge Management in Public Accounting Professional Services Firms: A North American Perspective," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 9(19), pages 27-34, November.
    10. Royston Greenwood & Stan X. Li & Rajshree Prakash & David L. Deephouse, 2005. "Reputation, Diversification, and Organizational Explanations of Performance in Professional Service Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 661-673, December.
    11. Al-Nakib Noofal Ahmed Mohsen Mohammed & Wang Hu, 2015. "Using Management Information Systems (MIS) to Boost Corporate Performance," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(11), pages 55-61, October.
    12. Kristijan Mirkovski & Frederik Briel & Paul Benjamin Lowry & Libo Liu, 2024. "Achieving entrepreneurial growth despite resource and capability constraints: the role of service intermediaries," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 353-380, January.
    13. Laila Naif Marouf & Naresh Kumar Agarwal, 2016. "Are Faculty Members Ready? Individual Factors Affecting Knowledge Management Readiness in Universities," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-28, September.
    14. Gracia, Louise & Oats, Lynne, 2012. "Boundary work and tax regulation: A Bourdieusian view," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 304-321.
    15. Cacciatori, Eugenia, 2008. "Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1591-1601, October.
    16. Eugenia Cacciatori, 2004. "Organisational Memory and Innovation Across Projects: Integrated Service Provision in Engineering Design Firms," SPRU Working Paper Series 117, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    17. Hasseldine, John & Holland, Kevin & van der Rijt, Pernill, 2011. "The market for corporate tax knowledge," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 39-52.
    18. Sébastien Gand & Philippe Lefebvre & Jean-Claude Sardas, 2007. "Professional Service Firms confronted with management challenges: can democracy be an organizational solution? A case-study in a democratic consulting firm," Post-Print hal-00818099, HAL.
    19. Cordasco, Carlo & Gherhes, Cristian & Brooks, Chay & Vorley, Tim, 2021. "An institutional taxonomy of adoption of innovation in the classic professions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. James Faulconbridge & Daniel Muzio, 2008. "Organizational professionalism in globalizing law firms," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 22(1), pages 7-25, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:9:y:1999:i:19:p:3-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.