IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beo/ekidpr/y2019i35p75-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ključni Makroekonomski Indikatori Održivog Razvoja U Bosni I Hercegovini (Key Macroeconomic Sustainable Development Indicators In Bosnia And Herzegovina)

Author

Listed:
  • Milica Bojat
  • Mladen Rebić

Abstract

Svrha rada je dublje sagledavanje ključnih makroekonomskih indikatora i analiziranje njihovog uticaja na održivi razvoj Bosne i Hercegovine. S obzirom da tržište samo nije sposobno da ostvari održivi razvoj, neophodno je uključiti dodatne instrumente u vidu propisa, standarda, etičkih principa, kao i niza drugih uticaja iz javnog i civilnog sektora. U radu je identifikovano pet grupa makroekonomskih (održivih) indikatora: ekonomski, društveno-kulturni, ekološki, politički i tehnološki. Principi održivog razvoja zahtevaju integraciju informacija koje se odnose na već pomenute indikatore, kao i izbor adekvatnih indikatora, što predstavlja imperativ za racionalno odlučivanje. U poslednjem delu rada, ove grupe indikatora analizirane su na primeru BiH. Na osnovu izvršene analize u ovom radu, zaključeno je da BiH treba da bude institucionalno razvijenija, sa konkurentnijom i dinamičnijom privredom i većim mogućnostima za ostvarenje održivog ekonomskog razvoja bazirajući se na pametni rast i pametnu specijalizaciju.

Suggested Citation

  • Milica Bojat & Mladen Rebić, 2019. "Ključni Makroekonomski Indikatori Održivog Razvoja U Bosni I Hercegovini (Key Macroeconomic Sustainable Development Indicators In Bosnia And Herzegovina)," Ekonomske ideje i praksa, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, issue 35, pages 75-93, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2019:i:35:p:75-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Rad-53.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanley, Nick & Moffatt, Ian & Faichney, Robin & Wilson, Mike, 1999. "Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for Scotland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 55-73, January.
    2. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    3. Kelly, Kristine L., 1998. "A systems approach to identifying decisive information for sustainable development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 452-464, September.
    4. Pezzey, John C.V. & Toman, Michael, 2002. "The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles," Discussion Papers 10683, Resources for the Future.
    5. Max-Neef, Manfred, 1995. "Economic growth and quality of life: a threshold hypothesis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 115-118, November.
    6. Alan Atkisson & R. Lee Hatcher, 2001. "The Compass Index Of Sustainability: Prototype For A Comprehensive Sustainability Information System," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(04), pages 509-532.
    7. Scott, Susan & Nolan, Brian & Fahey, Tony, 1996. "Formulating Environmental and Social Indicators for Sustainable Development," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number PRS27, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nourry, Myriam, 2008. "Measuring sustainable development: Some empirical evidence for France from eight alternative indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 441-456, October.
    2. Toman, Michael & Pezzey, John C., 2002. "The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles," RFF Working Paper Series dp-02-03, Resources for the Future.
    3. Nikos Chatzistamoulou & Phoebe Koundouri, 2020. "The Economics of Sustainable Development," DEOS Working Papers 2005, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    4. White, Leroy & Lee, Gregory John, 2009. "Operational research and sustainable development: Tackling the social dimension," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 683-692, March.
    5. Carl Obst & Lars Hein & Bram Edens, 2016. "National Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Assets and Their Services," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 64(1), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Nick Hanley & Louis Dupuy & Eoin McLaughlin, 2015. "Genuine Savings And Sustainability," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 779-806, September.
    7. Odile Blanchard & Arnaud Buchs, 2014. "Teaching Sustainable Development Issues: An Assessment of the Learning Effectiveness of Gaming," Working Papers halshs-00946227, HAL.
    8. John Holmberg & Johan Larsson, 2018. "A Sustainability Lighthouse—Supporting Transition Leadership and Conversations on Desirable Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    9. Pulido San Román, A., 2003. "Desarrollo sostenible: un reto central para el pensamiento económico," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 21, pages 203-220, Agosto.
    10. Teixidó-Figueras, Jordi & Duro, Juan Antonio, 2015. "The building blocks of International Ecological Footprint inequality: A Regression-Based Decomposition," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 30-39.
    11. E. Sattout & P. Caligari & S. Talhouk, 2008. "Perspectives for sustainable management of cedar forests in Lebanon: situation analysis and guidelines," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 107-127, February.
    12. Van Passel, Steven & Nevens, Frank & Mathijs, Erik & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2007. "Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 149-161, April.
    13. McGrath, Luke & Hynes , Stephen, 2020. "Approaches to accounting for our natural capital: Applications across Ireland," Working Papers 309501, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    14. Pulselli, Federico M. & Bravi, Mirko & Tiezzi, Enzo, 2012. "Application and use of the ISEW for assessing the sustainability of a regional system: A case study in Italy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 766-778.
    15. Trefflich, Annette, 2007. "Support scheme of food processing firms: A driving force for rural development?," IAMO Discussion Papers 105, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    16. M.A. Quaddus & M.A.B. Siddique, 2013. "Application of decision support tools in sustainable development planning: review and analysis," Chapters, in: M. A. Quaddus & M. A.B. Siddique (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development Planning, chapter 1, pages 3-16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Odile Blanchard & Arnaud Buchs, 2015. "Clarifying Sustainable Development Concepts Through Role playing," Post-Print hal-01103915, HAL.
    18. Mirko Armiento, 2016. "The Sustainable Welfare Index for Italy, 1960-2013," Working Papers 1601, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2016.
    19. Vandenhole Wouter, 2018. "De-Growth and Sustainable Development: Rethinking Human Rights Law and Poverty Alleviation," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 647-675, December.
    20. Ferng, Jiun-Jiun, 2014. "Nested open systems: An important concept for applying ecological footprint analysis to sustainable development assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 105-111.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    održivi razvoj; makroekonomski indikatori; indeks učinkovitosti vlada; pametni rast;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O20 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2019:i:35:p:75-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Goran Petrić (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeoyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.