IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v7y2023i3p677-684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation on The Availability of an Entreprise Risk Management Framework or Policy and its Impact on The Performance of National Water and Sanitation Council of Zambia (2010 – 2020)

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Mayaba

    (Degree of Master of Business Administration Finance, The University Of Zambia)

  • Dr Zavanai Mazhambe

    (Degree of Master of Business Administration Finance, The University Of Zambia)

Abstract

Scholars have argued that although Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a necessity to organizations or companies, the rate of implementation is still low (Mc Neil, 2015). The problem however, remains that most authors have not specifically looked at the impact of Enterprise Risk management on the performance of public regulatory bodies such as NWASCO. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the impact of Enterprise Risk Management Strategies on the problems that affect the performance of the National Water Supply and Sanitation Council in Zambia. To achieve the study objectives, the study adopted a mixed research approach in which both qualitative research design and quantitative research design were used. It also used an experience survey design and the study the target population of this study was managers and assistant officers of the four water utility firms. An estimate of 200 people to choose sample from was selected. The sample of this study consisted of 20 managers and 44 officers who were purposively selected from the National water and sanitation company body and the three (3) utility companies. In this sample, 5 managers and 11 assistant officers were selected from Finance, Audit and Risk management departments from all the study points. The data collected was analysed using the content analysis for qualitative data and Microsoft excel for quantitative data. From the findings, most of the information given by the respondents indicated that there is no specific ERM being used by NWASCO. After the analysis of documents and interviews were conducted with management as well as other respondents, no proper ERM was brought about by the respondents. Some respondents also lacked knowledge on Risk Management being used by NWASCO in their operations. The Company has not employed a qualified risk officer and it does not have a Risk department which looks into the company risks. However, NWASCO has put in place measures that would lead to a reduction in its exposure to risk to achieve the objectives, these measures included but not limited to; the Provision of incentives for service providers who comply with regulations set by NWASCO, Penalties For non-compliance to regulations, Community involvement and Audit-based regulation approach. NWASCO has also involved the Community in getting feedback on service provision from the WSS service providers. When the community is involved in decision making or any activity there is more acceptance, greater participation, willingness to support and strong sense of ownership. ERM can offer exceptional value if it is soundly applied. It is not only a team effort, but also an organization effort and not a random one. It needs to be based on a strong risk culture, and it requires the sponsorship of the executives in the company or institution. In addition, the aggregation of risk information needs to be performed according to clear rules that everyone would understand and abide by.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Mayaba & Dr Zavanai Mazhambe, 2023. "An Investigation on The Availability of an Entreprise Risk Management Framework or Policy and its Impact on The Performance of National Water and Sanitation Council of Zambia (2010 – 2020)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(3), pages 677-684, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:3:p:677-684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-7-issue-3/677-684.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/an-investigation-on-the-availability-of-an-entreprise-risk-management-framework-or-policy-and-its-impact-on-the-performance-of-national-water-and-sanitation-council-of-zambia-2010-2020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Abkowitz & Janey Camp, 2017. "Structuring an Enterprise Risk Assessment Protocol: Traditional Practice and New Methods," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 20(1), pages 79-97, March.
    2. Robert E. Hoyt & Andre P. Liebenberg, 2011. "The Value of Enterprise Risk Management," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(4), pages 795-822, December.
    3. Annette Hofmann & Nicos A. Scordis, 2018. "Challenges in Applying Risk Management Concepts in Practice: A Perspective," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 21(2), pages 309-333, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Najat Shakir Mahmood & Elsadig Musa Ahmed, 2023. "Mediating effect of risk management practices in Iraqi private banks financial performance," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 358-377, June.
    2. Gundula Glowka & Andreas Kallmünzer & Anita Zehrer, 2021. "Enterprise risk management in small and medium family enterprises: the role of family involvement and CEO tenure," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1213-1231, September.
    3. Kingsley Alawattegama, 2017. "The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Performance: Evidence from Sri Lankan Banking and Finance Industry," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 225-225, December.
    4. Al-Amri, Khalid & Davydov, Yevgeniy, 2016. "Testing the effectiveness of ERM: Evidence from operational losses," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 70-82.
    5. Nguyen, Minh Hong & Trinh, Vu Quang, 2023. "U.K. economic policy uncertainty and innovation activities: A firm-level analysis," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    7. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Nadine Gatzert & Philipp Reichel, 2022. "Awareness of climate risks and opportunities: empirical evidence on determinants and value from the U.S. and European insurance industry," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(1), pages 5-26, January.
    9. Elisabetta Mafrolla & Felice Matozza, 2014. "Risk management and firm size: a survey of Italian private companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 87-108.
    10. Dionne, Georges & El Hraiki, Rayane & Mnasri, Mohamed, 2023. "Determinants and real effects of joint hedging: An empirical analysis of US oil and gas producers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. David Blake & Marco Morales & Enrico Biffis & Yijia Lin & Andreas Milidonis, 2017. "Special Edition: Longevity 10 – The Tenth International Longevity Risk and Capital Markets Solutions Conference," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(S1), pages 515-532, April.
    12. Dupire, Marion & Slagmulder, Regine, 2019. "Risk governance of financial institutions: The effect of ownership structure and board independence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 227-237.
    13. Stanley Chege & Gregory Wanyembi & Constantine Nyamboga, 2023. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices in Kenya," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 15-26, April.
    14. Yongrok Choi & Xiaoxia Ye & Lu Zhao & Amanda Luo, 2016. "Optimizing enterprise risk management: a literature review and critical analysis of the work of Wu and Olson," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 281-300, February.
    15. Songling Yang & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Muhammad Anwar, 2018. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices and Firm Performance, the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage and the Moderating Role of Financial Literacy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Andrew F. Whitman, 2015. "Is ERM Legally Required? Yes for Financial and Governmental Institutions, No for Private Enterprises," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 18(2), pages 161-197, September.
    17. Goksel KORKMAZ, 2020. "The Moderating Effect of Internal Audit in Strategic Planning Implementation Success," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(88), pages 57-84, June.
    18. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Zaman, Mahbub & Buckby, Sherrena, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    19. Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest & Jun Liu & Huan Guo & Yong Liu & Theresa M. Phipps & Yuanjun Yang & Yaru Cao, 2022. "Market Competition and Economic Effects of Government Policies," International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Erwann Michel-Kerjan & Paul Raschky & Howard Kunreuther, 2015. "Corporate Demand for Insurance: New Evidence From the U.S. Terrorism and Property Markets," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 82(3), pages 505-530, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:3:p:677-684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.