IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/awu/journl/v15y2021i1p45-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the role and consequences of Econophysics from a Marxian perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolaos Th. Chatzarakis

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)

Abstract

The idea that economic phenomena are governed by stochasticity and uncertainty led to the extensive use of concepts and methods from the physical sciences that deal with non-deterministic patterns, giving rise to the multidisciplinary field of Econophysics. The last decade, several voices rose against it arguing that no new knowledge has been obtained and that the Econophysicists have merely ‘discovered’ what was already known in Economics. There also have been economists arguing that the mixture of physical models and economic ideas can still blossom and provide new insights into the study of Economics. In this paper, we attempt to reveal a different aspect of Econophysics, one that builds on its corroborative character and its role in criticizing neoclassical approach. In our view Econophysics can be used as a new enlarged version of Econometrics, as a set of methodologies to subject the economic models to logical and empirical tests. But, to do so, we argue, it is also necessary to ‘release’ this strict methodological research from any theoretical or ideological doctrine, including those neoclassical axioms so well incorporated in Economics. In view of this, we show that econophysical models by and large give further insights to discard the Marginalist paradigm point towards a different perception, closer to the old Classical and Marxian theories of political economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolaos Th. Chatzarakis, 2021. "Revisiting the role and consequences of Econophysics from a Marxian perspective," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 15(1), pages 45-68, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:awu:journl:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:45-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://serialsjournals.com/abstract/18289_2-chawatzibope2021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.bulletinofpe.com/nikolaos-th-chatzarakis-20211
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Flaschel, 2010. "Topics in Classical Micro- and Macroeconomics," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-00324-0, December.
    2. Stefania Vitali & James B Glattfelder & Stefano Battiston, 2011. "The Network of Global Corporate Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-6, October.
    3. Franck Jovanovic & Christophe Schinckus, 2013. "The Emergence of Econophysics: A New Approach in Modern Financial Theory," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 443-474, Fall.
    4. Alberto Russo, 2017. "An Agent Based Macroeconomic Model with Social Classes and Endogenous Crises," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 3(3), pages 285-306, November.
    5. A. Chakraborti & I. Muni-Toke & M. Patriarca & F. Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics Review : II. Agent-based models," Post-Print hal-03332946, HAL.
    6. Anirban Chakraborti & Ioane Muni Toke & Marco Patriarca & Frederic Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics review: II. Agent-based models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(7), pages 1013-1041.
    7. Drăgulescu, Adrian & Yakovenko, Victor M., 2001. "Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 213-221.
    8. Brancaccio, Emiliano & Giammetti, Raffaele & Lopreite, Milena & Puliga, Michelangelo, 2018. "Centralization of capital and financial crisis: A global network analysis of corporate control," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 94-104.
    9. Hiroaki Sasaki, 2013. "Cyclical growth in a Goodwin–Kalecki–Marx model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 108(2), pages 145-171, March.
    10. Lefteris Tsoulfidis & Persefoni Tsaliki, 2019. "Classical Political Economics and Modern Capitalism," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-17967-0, December.
    11. Wright, Ian, 2005. "The social architecture of capitalism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 346(3), pages 589-620.
    12. Jovanovic, Franck & Schinckus, Christophe, 2013. "Econophysics: A New Challenge For Financial Economics?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(3), pages 319-352, September.
    13. Anirban Chakraborti & Ioane Muni Toke & Marco Patriarca & Frederic Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics review: I. Empirical facts," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(7), pages 991-1012.
    14. Mantegna,Rosario N. & Stanley,H. Eugene, 2007. "Introduction to Econophysics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521039871.
    15. Shaikh, Anwar, 2016. "Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199390632.
    16. Anirban Chakraborti & Ioane Muni Toke & Marco Patriarca & Frédéric Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics review: I. Empirical facts," Post-Print hal-00621058, HAL.
    17. Harvie, David, 2000. "Testing Goodwin: Growth Cycles in Ten OECD Countries," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(3), pages 349-376, May.
    18. Shaikh, Anwar & Jacobo, Juan Esteban, 2020. "Economic Arbitrage and the Econophysics of Income Inequality," Review of Behavioral Economics, now publishers, vol. 7(4), pages 299–315-2, December.
    19. Kiran Sharma & Parul Khurana, 2021. "Growth and dynamics of Econophysics: a bibliometric and network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4417-4436, May.
    20. Sonia R. Bentes, 2010. "Econophysics: A new discipline," Papers 1006.3956, arXiv.org.
    21. Ellis Scharfenaker & Gregor Semieniuk, 2017. "A Statistical Equilibrium Approach to the Distribution of Profit Rates," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 465-499, July.
    22. de Area Leão Pereira, Eder Johnson & da Silva, Marcus Fernandes & Pereira, H.B.B., 2017. "Econophysics: Past and present," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 251-261.
    23. Anirban Chakraborti & Ioane Muni Toke & Marco Patriarca & Frédéric Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics review: II. Agent-based models," Post-Print hal-00621059, HAL.
    24. Gallegati, Mauro & Keen, Steve & Lux, Thomas & Ormerod, Paul, 2006. "Worrying trends in econophysics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 370(1), pages 1-6.
    25. Richmond, Peter & Mimkes, Jurgen & Hutzler, Stefan, 2013. "Econophysics and Physical Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199674701.
    26. Stirati, Antonella & Paternesi Meloni, Walter, 2021. "Unemployment and the wage share: a long-run exploration for major mature economies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 330-352.
    27. Anwar Shaikh, 2017. "Income Distribution, Econophysics and Piketty," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 18-29, January.
    28. Di Guilmi, C. & Gallegati, M. & Landini, S. & Stiglitz, J.E., 2020. "An analytical solution for network models with heterogeneous and interacting agents," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 189-220.
    29. A. Krawiec & M. Szydlowski, 1999. "The Kaldor‐Kalecki business cycle model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 89(0), pages 89-100, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellis Scharfenaker, 2022. "Statistical Equilibrium Methods In Analytical Political Economy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-309, April.
    2. Fei Cao & Sebastien Motsch, 2021. "Derivation of wealth distributions from biased exchange of money," Papers 2105.07341, arXiv.org.
    3. Schinckus, C., 2013. "Between complexity of modelling and modelling of complexity: An essay on econophysics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(17), pages 3654-3665.
    4. Ignacio Ormazábal & F. A. Borotto & H. F. Astudillo, 2017. "Influence of Money Distribution on Civil Violence Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, November.
    5. Anirban Chakraborti & Hrishidev & Kiran Sharma & Hirdesh K. Pharasi, 2019. "Phase separation and scaling in correlation structures of financial markets," Papers 1910.06242, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    6. Kiran Sharma & Subhradeep Das & Anirban Chakraborti, 2017. "Global Income Inequality and Savings: A Data Science Perspective," Papers 1801.00253, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    7. Ban Zheng & François Roueff & Frédéric Abergel, 2014. "Ergodicity and scaling limit of a constrained multivariate Hawkes process," Post-Print hal-00777941, HAL.
    8. Hong Guo & Jianwu Lin & Fanlin Huang, 2023. "Market Making with Deep Reinforcement Learning from Limit Order Books," Papers 2305.15821, arXiv.org.
    9. Pierre Gosselin & Aïleen Lotz & Marc Wambst, 2020. "A path integral approach to business cycle models with large number of agents," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(4), pages 899-942, October.
    10. Moura, N.J. & Ribeiro, Marcelo B., 2013. "Testing the Goodwin growth-cycle macroeconomic dynamics in Brazil," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(9), pages 2088-2103.
    11. Pierre Gosselin & Aïleen Lotz & Marc Wambst, 2019. "A Statistical Field Approach to Capital Accumulation," Working Papers hal-02280634, HAL.
    12. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00777941 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Pierre Gosselin & Aïleen Lotz & Marc Wambst, 2017. "A Path Integral Approach to Interacting Economic Systems with Multiple Heterogeneous Agents," Working Papers hal-01549586, HAL.
    14. Ivan Jericevich & Patrick Chang & Tim Gebbie, 2021. "Simulation and estimation of an agent-based market-model with a matching engine," Papers 2108.07806, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    15. Inoua, Sabiou M. & Smith, Vernon L., 2023. "A classical model of speculative asset price dynamics," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    16. Ban Zheng & Franc{c}ois Roueff & Fr'ed'eric Abergel, 2013. "Ergodicity and scaling limit of a constrained multivariate Hawkes process," Papers 1301.5007, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2014.
    17. Martin Šmíd, 2016. "Estimation of zero-intelligence models by L1 data," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(9), pages 1423-1444, September.
    18. Pierre Gosselin & Aïleen Lotz & Marc Wambst, 2021. "A statistical field approach to capital accumulation," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 16(4), pages 817-908, October.
    19. Salvador Pueyo, 2013. "Is it a power law distribution? The case of economic contractions," Papers 1310.2567, arXiv.org.
    20. Restocchi, Valerio & McGroarty, Frank & Gerding, Enrico, 2019. "Statistical properties of volume and calendar effects in prediction markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 1150-1160.
    21. Pierre Gosselin & Aïleen Lotz & Marc Wambst, 2018. "A Path Integral Approach to Business Cycle Models with Large Number of Agents," Working Papers hal-01893556, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Econophysics; Political Economy;

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B13 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian)
    • B14 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Socialist; Marxist
    • B16 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Quantitative and Mathematical
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:awu:journl:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:45-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maria Cristina Barbieri Goes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.bulletinofpe.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.