IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p166-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Critical Success Factors for the Technology Transfer in the Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit Project

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Rahman Hamdan*

    (Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia)

  • Mohamad Syazli Fathi

    (Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia)

  • Zainai Mohamed

    (Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia)

Abstract

The Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit (KVMRT) Project is the most massive infrastructure project in Malaysia’s history. The development of the KVMRT project requires not just local resources but as well as the involvement of foreign expertise. The government in recognising the need to reduce the dependence on foreign expertise in the local rail industry has introduced several measures for technology transfer in the KVMRT Project. The purpose of this paper is to review and identify the critical success factors in the technology transfer program in the KVMRT project. Key personnel directly involved in the planning and implementation of the technology transfer program in the MRT project were interviewed. A qualitative analysis using NVIVO 11 was done based on the findings from the interviews. Nine key success factors have been identified based on the study which are; recipient’s characteristics, provider’s characteristics, communication channel, coordination and monitoring, transfer environment, government’s policy, learning environment, mode of transfer and planning of transfer. Findings show that even though the program is well coordinated, the initial plan is one of the critical factors that need to be improved. Proper measurement also needs to be established to measure the effectiveness of the technology transfer program.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Rahman Hamdan* & Mohamad Syazli Fathi & Zainai Mohamed, 2018. "The Critical Success Factors for the Technology Transfer in the Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit Project," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 166-172:2.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:166-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi2.59.166-172.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/11-2018/2/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phan, Phillip H. & Siegel, Donald S., 2006. "The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 77-144, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maciej Woźniak & Marek Matejun & Fadhlur Rahim Azmi & Mior Harris Mior Harun & Fazlena Hamzah, 2023. "Technology Transfer Centers as Support Instruments for SMEs—Comparative Analysis of Poland and Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Borge & Stefanie Bröring, 2020. "What affects technology transfer in emerging knowledge areas? A multi-stakeholder concept mapping study in the bioeconomy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 430-460, April.
    2. Cornelia Lawson, 2016. "Putting the Region First: Knowledge Transfer at Universities in Greater Manchester," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: David Audretsch & Erik Lehmann & Michele Meoli & Silvio Vismara (ed.), University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 303-325, Springer.
    3. Fini, Riccardo & Grimaldi, Rosa & Meoli, Azzurra, 2020. "The effectiveness of university regulations to foster science-based entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    4. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.
    5. Edward Bergman, 2011. "Marshall's Dilemma: Intangible Assets and European Universities," ERSA conference papers ersa10p363, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Christopher S. Hayter, 2016. "A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 633-656, October.
    7. Nivedita Mukherji & Jonathan Silberman, 2021. "Knowledge flows between universities and industry: the impact of distance, technological compatibility, and the ability to diffuse knowledge," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 223-257, February.
    8. Gibson, Elizabeth & Daim, Tugrul U. & Dabic, Marina, 2019. "Evaluating university industry collaborative research centers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 181-202.
    9. Giorgio Calcagnini & Germana Giombini & Paolo Liberati & Giuseppe Travaglini, 2019. "Technology transfer with search intensity and project advertising," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1529-1546, October.
    10. Chiara Aleffi & Sabrina Tomasi & Concetta Ferrara & Cristina Santini & Gigliola Paviotti & Federica Baldoni & Alessio Cavicchi, 2020. "Universities and Wineries: Supporting Sustainable Development in Disadvantaged Rural Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2022. "Drivers of academic engagement in public–private research collaboration: an empirical study," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1861-1884, December.
    12. Ahmed Alshumaimri & Taylor Aldridge & David Audretsch, 2012. "Scientist entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 648-657, October.
    13. Johnson, William H.A., 2011. "Managing university technology development using organizational control theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 842-852, July.
    14. Victoria Galán-Muros & Peter Sijde & Peter Groenewegen & Thomas Baaken, 2017. "Nurture over nature: How do European universities support their collaboration with business?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 184-205, February.
    15. Aldridge, T. Taylor & Audretsch, David, 2011. "The Bayh-Dole Act and scientist entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 1058-1067, October.
    16. O’Kane, Conor & Mangematin, Vincent & Geoghegan, Will & Fitzgerald, Ciara, 2015. "University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 421-437.
    17. Aldo Geuna & Alessandro Muscio, 2008. "The governance of University knowledge transfer," SPRU Working Paper Series 173, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    18. Erikson, Truls & Knockaert, Mirjam & Foo, Maw Der, 2015. "Enterprising scientists: The shaping role of norms, experience and scientific productivity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 211-221.
    19. Claudia Curi & Cinzia Daraio & Patrick Llerena, 2012. "University technology transfer: how (in)efficient are French universities?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(3), pages 629-654.
    20. Roland Helm & Oliver Mauroner, 2007. "Success of research-based spin-offs. State-of-the-art and guidelines for further research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 237-270, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:166-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.