IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jabsss/2019p26-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining service innovation competencies of Turkish deposit banks with fuzzy ANP, fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR methods

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan Dinçer

    (Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Umit Hacıoğlu

    (Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Serhat Yü ksel

    (Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

It is aimed to rank the service innovation issues of deposit banks in Turkey. In this context, 26 deposit banks of Turkey are analyzed by considering 16 different balanced scorecard-based criteria. Regarding the methodology, first of all, fuzzy ANP method is used to measure the significance of dimensions and criteria. It is defined that the most significant dimension is performance. It is also seen that organizational compliance (D3) is on the last rank. Additionally, return on investment (C1), profitability (C2) and customer expectations (C5) have highest significance. These alternatives are ranked by considering fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR methods. It is understood that the results of both these two methods are very similar. It is concluded that there is not a comparative advantage among the banks regarding the ownership type. For example, the best bank (F15) is a foreign bank whereas the worst bank (F13) is also another foreign bank. Similar to this situation, some private banks (P1, P7, P8) have successful performance while some others (P4, P5) have weak performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan Dinçer & Umit Hacıoğlu & Serhat Yü ksel, 2019. "Examining service innovation competencies of Turkish deposit banks with fuzzy ANP, fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR methods," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 5(1), pages 26-36.
    • Handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2019:p:26-36
    DOI: 10.20474/jabs-5.1.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jabs5.1.3.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Jabs-5.1.3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jabs-5.1.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dincer, Hasan & Yuksel, Serhat, 2019. "Balanced scorecard-based analysis of investment decisions for the renewable energy alternatives: A comparative analysis based on the hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1259-1270.
    2. van Riel, A.C.R. & Lievens, A., 2003. "New service development in high tech sectors: a decision making perspective," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    3. Serhat Yuksel & Sinemis Zengin, 2017. "Influencing Factors of Net Interest Margin in Turkish Banking Sector," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 178-191.
    4. Helen Perks & Nina Riihela, 2004. "An exploration of inter-functional integration in the new service development process," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 37-63, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    2. Serhat Yuksel & Hasan Dincer & Senol Emir, 2017. "Comparing the performance of Turkish deposit banks by using DEMATEL, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and MOORA approaches," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 26-47, December.
    3. Hsiao-Fen Hsiao & Tingyong Zhong & Hasan Dincer, 2019. "Analysing Managers’ Financial Motivation for Sustainable Investment Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Brumana, Giovanni & Franchini, Giuseppe & Ghirardi, Elisa & Perdichizzi, Antonio, 2022. "Techno-economic optimization of hybrid power generation systems: A renewables community case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Aleksandra Ostrowska, 2023. "Makroekonomiczne determinanty jakości kredytów dla sektora niefinansowego w Polsce," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 54(5), pages 541-556.
    7. Heeyong Noh & Youngkeun Song & Ae-Soon Park & Byungun Yoon & Sungjoo Lee, 2016. "Development of new technology-based services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5-6), pages 200-222, April.
    8. Rekha Guchhait & Biswajit Sarkar, 2023. "Increasing Growth of Renewable Energy: A State of Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    9. Kaytez, Fazıl, 2022. "Evaluation of priority strategies for the expansion of installed wind power capacity in Turkey using a fuzzy analytic network process analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1281-1293.
    10. TANASE, George Cosmin, 2012. "The Significance of Strategic Service Innovation Management in Retailing," Romanian Distribution Committee Magazine, Romanian Distribution Committee, vol. 3(3), pages 36-40, September.
    11. Galleguillos-Pozo, R. & Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Pastor, R., 2021. "Design of stand-alone electrification systems using fuzzy mathematical programming approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Hegazy Rezk & Basem Alamri & Mokhtar Aly & Ahmed Fathy & Abdul G. Olabi & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Hamdy A. Ziedan, 2021. "Multicriteria Decision-Making to Determine the Optimal Energy Management Strategy of Hybrid PV–Diesel Battery-Based Desalination System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Filiz Mızrak & Serhat Yüksel, 2019. "Significant Determiners of Greek Debt Crisis: A Comparative Analysis with Probit and MARS Approaches," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(3), pages 33-50, July.
    14. Osman Taylan & Rami Alamoudi & Mohammad Kabli & Alawi AlJifri & Fares Ramzi & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2020. "Assessment of Energy Systems Using Extended Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy VIKOR, and TOPSIS Approaches to Manage Non-Cooperative Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Yu-Cheng Lee & Jih-Kuang Chen, 2009. "A new service development integrated model," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(12), pages 1669-1686, December.
    16. Lucia Crevani & Kristina Palm & Annika Schilling, 2011. "Innovation management in service firms: a research agenda," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(2), pages 177-193, June.
    17. Shu-Hua Chien & Jyh-jye Chen, 2008. "Supplier involvement and customer involvement effect on new product development success in the financial service industry," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 185-201, February.
    18. Augusto Cesar Campos de Souza Machado & Geraldo Lucio Tiago Filho & Thiago Modesto de Abreu & Francesco Facchini & Robson Francisco da Silva & Luiz Fernando Rodrigues Pinto, 2023. "Use of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Performance Indicators for Small-Scale Hydropower Project Attractiveness Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Muhammad Raza & Ali Saleh Alshebami & Amena Sibghatullah, 2020. "Factors Influencing Renewable Energy Technological Innovation in Malaysia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 573-579.
    20. Ulaş Ünlü & Neşe Yalçın & Nuri Avşarlıgil, 2022. "Analysis of Efficiency and Productivity of Commercial Banks in Turkey Pre- and during COVID-19 with an Integrated MCDM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2019:p:26-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Dr. Usman Raja (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/9 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.