IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aml/intbrm/v12y2021i4p175-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Feasibility of Plastic Bag Usage for Newly Established South African Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises Amidst Increases in Sin tax: An Online Desktop Study

Author

Listed:
  • Juan-Pierré Bruwer

    (Business Re-Solution, Wellington, 7655, South Africa)

  • Lindiwe Mabesele

    (Cape Town, 8000, South Africa)

  • Timeeka Brown

    (Cape Town, 8000, South Africa)

  • Courtney Charles

    (Cape Town, 8000, South Africa)

  • Ingrid Coulter

    (Cape Town, 8000, South Africa)

  • Edlin Williams

    (Cape Town, 8000, South Africa)

  • Nadine Witbooi

    (Cape Town, 8000, South Africa)

Abstract

Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) contribute socio-economic value to the South African economy and assist with the alleviation of poverty, the distribution of wealth and the creation of jobs. Regardless of the latter, prior research shows that these business entities have among the highest failure rates in the world with 71% of start-up South African SMMEs failing within their first year of operation. Apart from operating in a non-conducive economic environment and being influenced by the “liability of newness”, these business entities are adversely affected by taxation. Apart from having to pay direct taxation, some South African SMMEs are also subject to indirect taxation, especially those that sell goods. One such taxation is that of Sin tax; taxation levied on goods that are harmful to human health and/or the environment such as tobacco products, alcohol products and plastic bags. Particularly, Sin tax has been levied on plastic bags (US$ 0.015) since 1 April 2013, but the demand for it has not significantly decreased since then. Since newly established South African SMMEs are susceptible to the “liability of newness”, it is disconcerting to note that these business entities have to pay Sin tax on plastic bags before selling them. Although Sin tax levied on plastic bags has a negative influence on South African SMME profitability, it may be that further increases in this levy may affect newly established South African SMMEs’ profitability to such an extent that the buying and selling of plastic bags are no longer feasible – the objective of the study. This non-empirical study took on the form of an online desktop review whereby secondary data were scrutinised; making the study qualitative in nature. From the research conducted, it appears that further increases in Sin tax levied on plastic bags will render the use of plastic bags by newly established South African SMMEs not feasible.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan-Pierré Bruwer & Lindiwe Mabesele & Timeeka Brown & Courtney Charles & Ingrid Coulter & Edlin Williams & Nadine Witbooi, 2021. "The Feasibility of Plastic Bag Usage for Newly Established South African Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises Amidst Increases in Sin tax: An Online Desktop Study," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(4), pages 175-190, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:aml:intbrm:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:175-190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cscjournals.org/manuscript/Journals/IJBRM/Volume12/Issue4/IJBRM-295.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.cscjournals.org/library/manuscriptinfo.php?mc=IJBRM-295
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olawale Fatoki, 2018. "The Impact of Entrepreneurial Resilience on the Success of Small and Medium Enterprises in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Wiklund, Johan & Baker, Ted & Shepherd, Dean, 2010. "The age-effect of financial indicators as buffers against the liability of newness," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 423-437, July.
    3. Dikgang, Johane & Leiman, Anthony & Visser, Martine, 2012. "Analysis of the plastic-bag levy in South Africa," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 59-65.
    4. Henrik Barth & Ghazal Zalkat, 2020. "Immigrant Entrepreneurship in Sweden: The Liability of Newness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Hunt Allcott & Benjamin B Lockwood & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2019. "Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(3), pages 1557-1626.
    6. Johane Dikgang & Anthony Leiman & Martine Visser, 2012. "Elasticity of demand, price and time: lessons from South Africa's plastic-bag levy," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(26), pages 3339-3342, September.
    7. Reviva Hasson & Anthony Leiman & Martine Visser, 2007. "The Economics Of Plastic Bag Legislation In South Africa1," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 75(1), pages 66-83, March.
    8. Roy Bahl (ed.), 2003. "Restructuring Local Government Finance in Developing Countries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2930.
    9. Doubell Chamberlain & Anja Smith, 2006. "Recent Findings on Tax-Related Regulatory Burden on SMMEs in South Africa. Literature Review and Policy Options," Working Papers 06105, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    10. Hamideh Javadinasab & Iravan Masoudi Asl & Abbas Vosoogh‐Moghaddam & Behzad Najafi, 2020. "Comparing selected countries using sin tax policy in sustainable health financing: Implications for developing countries," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 68-78, January.
    11. Kai Kaiser & Caryn Bredenkamp & Roberto Iglesias, 2016. "Sin Tax Reform in the Philippines," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 24617, December.
    12. Indianna D. Minto-Coy, 2019. "From the periphery to the centre: start-up and growth strategies for minority diaspora entrepreneurs," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 36(1/2), pages 189-215.
    13. Burtseva Tatiana & Shugar Valeriya, 2015. "Special economic zones as an instrument to enhance international cooperation in the economic conditions imposed sanctions," International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, CyberLeninka;ROSTranse Trade F Z C, issue 2 (2), pages 24-26.
    14. Dario Maimone Ansaldo Patti & Ram Mudambi & Pietro Navarra & Daniela Baglieri, 2016. "A tale of soil and seeds: the external environment and entrepreneurial entry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 955-980, December.
    15. Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Marjotta-Maistro, Marta C. & Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., 2002. "Economic landscapes, what are they? An application to the Brazilian economy and to sugar cane complex," MPRA Paper 54229, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Kay, John A, 1990. "Tax Policy: A Survey," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(399), pages 18-75, March.
    17. Haroon Bhorat & Zaakhir Asmal & Kezia Lilenstein & Kirsten van der Zee, 2018. "SMMES in South Africa: Understanding the Constraints on Growth and Performance," Working Papers 201802, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    18. Bruce MASAMA & Juan-Pierré BRUWER, 2018. "Revisiting the Economic Factors which Influence Fast Food South African Small, Medium and Micro Enterprise Sustainability," Expert Journal of Business and Management, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(1), pages 19-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan-Pierré BRUWER & Mariaan LOMBARD & Yolandé SMIT & Ankit KATRODIA, 2019. "The Influence of Excise Taxation Levied on Product Sales on the Financial Sustainability of South African Tobacco-and-Alcohol-Selling Small, Medium and Micro Enterprise," Expert Journal of Business and Management, Sprint Investify, vol. 7(1), pages 100-106.
    2. Doris Knoblauch & Linda Mederake & Ulf Stein, 2018. "Developing Countries in the Lead—What Drives the Diffusion of Plastic Bag Policies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Thornton Matheson, 2022. "Disposal is not free: fiscal instruments to internalize the environmental costs of solid waste," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(4), pages 1047-1073, August.
    4. Rebecca L. C. Taylor, 2022. "It's in the bag? The effect of plastic carryout bag bans on where and what people purchase to eat," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(5), pages 1563-1584, October.
    5. Johane Dikgang & Martine Visser, 2012. "Behavioural Response To Plastic Bag Legislation In Botswana," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 80(1), pages 123-133, March.
    6. Tatiana A. Homonoff, 2018. "Can Small Incentives Have Large Effects? The Impact of Taxes versus Bonuses on Disposable Bag Use," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 177-210, November.
    7. Dikgang, Johane & Leiman, Anthony & Visser, Martine, 2012. "Analysis of the plastic-bag levy in South Africa," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 59-65.
    8. Cabrera, José María & Caffera, Marcelo & Cid, Alejandro, 2020. "Small Incentives May Have Large Effects: The Impact of Prices on the Demand for Plastic Bags," MPRA Paper 100178, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Cabrera, José María & Caffera, Marcelo & Cid, Alejandro, 2021. "Modest and incomplete incentives may work: Pricing plastic bags in Uruguay," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Hausman, Catherine & Stolper, Samuel, 2021. "Inequality, information failures, and air pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    11. Martin O'Connell & Pierre Dubois & Rachel Griffith, 2022. "The Use of Scanner Data for Economics Research," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 723-745, August.
    12. Abootorabi, Hooman & Wiklund, Johan & Johnson, Alan R. & Miller, Cameron D., 2021. "A holistic approach to the evolution of an entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploratory study of academic spin-offs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    13. Thi Thanh Thuy Phan & Van Viet Nguyen & Hong Thi Thu Nguyen & Chun-Hung Lee, 2022. "Integrating Citizens’ Importance-Performance Aspects into Sustainable Plastic Waste Management in Danang, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Jingze Jiang, 2016. "Peer Pressure in Voluntary Environmental Programs: a Case of the Bag Rewards Program," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 155-190, June.
    15. Kao, Kai-Erh & Jones, Amanda C. & Ohinmaa, Arto & Paulden, Mike, 2020. "The health and financial impacts of a sugary drink tax across different income groups in Canada," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    16. Rubina Romanello & Maria Chiarvesio, 2019. "Early internationalizing firms: 2004–2018," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 172-219, June.
    17. Chitsaz, Ehsan & Liang, Dapeng & Khoshsoroor, Somayeh, 2017. "The impact of resource configuration on Iranian technology venture performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 186-195.
    18. Rebecca L. Taylor & Sofia B. Villas-Boas, 2016. "Bans vs. Fees: Disposable Carryout Bag Policies and Bag Usage," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 351-372.
    19. Haeck, Catherine & Lawson, Nicholas & Poirier, Krystel, 2022. "Estimating consumer preferences for different beverages using the BLP approach," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    20. Zarko Kalamov, 2021. "Evaluating Marginal Internalities: A New Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 9476, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sin Tax; Profitability; SMMEs; Cape Metropole; Plastic Bags; Usage.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aml:intbrm:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:175-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nabeel Tahir (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.