IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/aucsse/v1y2020i48p5-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation Between Corporate Governance Characteristics And Financial Performance Of The Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Maria Alexie

    (University of Craiova Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

Being considered an important instrument in ensuring prosperity of the companies, the corporate governance represents a topic which has aroused interest of numerous disciplines. The aim of this work is to study the relationship between governance characteristics and the financial performance Exchange (Return On Assets (ROA) and the Return On Equity (ROE) ) of the entities listed on Bucharest Stock (BVB). The research is carried out on a sample of 31 companies, during 3 years (2016-2018). The results of this analysis indicate a positive relationship existence between the variable represented by the dimension of the Management, and the performance of the companies expressed through ROA and ROE. A positive relationship has been obtained between the compliance rank with the Corporate Governance Code (CGC) and the financial performance of the entities listed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Maria Alexie, 2020. "Correlation Between Corporate Governance Characteristics And Financial Performance Of The Companies," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(48), pages 5-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:1:y:2020:i:48:p:5-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://feaa.ucv.ro/AUCSSE/0048v1-001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey C. Kiel & Gavin J. Nicholson, 2003. "Board Composition and Corporate Performance: how the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 189-205, July.
    2. Paula L. Rechner & Dan R. Dalton, 1991. "CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 155-160, February.
    3. Paul Guest, 2009. "The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 385-404.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, June.
    2. John K. Malagila & Alaa M. Zalata & Collins G. Ntim & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2021. "Corporate governance and performance in sports organisations: The case of UK premier leagues," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 2517-2537, April.
    3. Collins Gyakari Ntim, 2012. "Does the South African stock market value an independent dual board leadership structure?," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 35-45.
    4. Sanja Pekovic & Sebastian Vogt, 2021. "The fit between corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: the impact on a firm’s financial performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1095-1125, May.
    5. María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez & Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez, 2019. "An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 612-627, May.
    6. María Consuelo Pucheta-Martínez & Isabel Gallego-Álvarez, 2020. "Do board characteristics drive firm performance? An international perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 1251-1297, December.
    7. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    8. Pascal Nguyen & Nahid Rahman & Alex Tong & Ruoyun Zhao, 2016. "Board size and firm value: evidence from Australia," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(4), pages 851-873, December.
    9. Vincenzo Scafarto & Federica Ricci & Elisabetta Magnaghi & Salvatore Ferri, 2021. "Board structure and intellectual capital efficiency: does the family firm status matter?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 841-878, September.
    10. Lippert, Inge, 2008. "Perspektivenverschiebungen in der Corporate Governance: Neuere Ansätze und Studien der Corporate-Governance-Forschung," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2008-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Renuka Sharma & Kiran Mehta & Archana Goel, 2023. "Non-linear relationship between board size and performance of Indian companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1277-1301, December.
    12. Anjala Kalsie & Shikha Mittal Shrivastav, 2016. "Analysis of Board Size and Firm Performance: Evidence from NSE Companies Using Panel Data Approach," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 9(2), pages 148-172, December.
    13. Arindam Banik & Chanchal Chatterjee, 2021. "Ownership Pattern and Governance–Performance Relation: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(2), pages 422-441, April.
    14. Paul McGuinness & Kevin Lam & João Vieito, 2015. "Gender and other major board characteristics in China: Explaining corporate dividend policy and governance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 989-1038, December.
    15. Aziz Jaafar & Lynn Hodgkinson & Mao-Feng Kao, 2019. "Ownership Structure, Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Taiwan," Working Papers 19011, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    16. Jermias, Johnny & Gani, Lindawati, 2014. "The impact of board capital and board characteristics on firm performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 135-153.
    17. Collins G. Ntim & Kwaku K. Opong & Jo Danbolt, 2015. "Board size, corporate regulations and firm valuation in an emerging market: a simultaneous equation approach," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 194-220, March.
    18. Chowdhury, Biplob & Dungey, Mardi & Pham, Thu Phuong, 2014. "The impact of post-IPO changes in corporate governance mechanisms on firm performance: evidence from young Australian firms," Working Papers 2014-11, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, revised 24 Sep 2014.
    19. Apu Manna & Tarak Nath Sahu & Krishna Dayal Pandey, 2020. "Board size, multiple directorship and performance of Indian listed firms," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(2), pages 111-129.
    20. Laura Cabeza-García & Esther B. Brío & Carlos Rueda, 2021. "The moderating effect of innovation on the gender and performance relationship in the outset of the gender revolution," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 755-778, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate governance; performance; return on equity; return on assets; companies listed;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • C30 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:1:y:2020:i:48:p:5-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anca Bandoi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.