IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/155428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embedded Seed Technology and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nalley, Lanier
  • Popp, Michael
  • Niederman, Zara

Abstract

Agriculture’s significant global contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has spurred consumer and retailer interest in GHG mitigation and may lead to incentive programs for producers to lessen GHG emissions. Along those lines, a producer choice is the use of embedded seed technology designed to enhance the marketable portion of yield through improved disease, weed, and pest management with the same or lower use of inputs. This article examines commonalities and differences across three recent studies on rice, sweet corn, and cotton, which addressed the impacts of embedded seed technology on yield, input use, and GHG emissions. Embedded seed technology can be any method of improving the physical or genetic characteristics of a seed. These seed enhancements can include physiological quality, vigor, and synchronicity (consistency across seedlings in time of emergence and size) through traditional breeding, hybrid breeding, or biotechnology.

Suggested Citation

  • Nalley, Lanier & Popp, Michael & Niederman, Zara, 2013. "Embedded Seed Technology and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45, pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:155428
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.155428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/155428/files/jaae453ip14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.155428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seungdo Kim & Bruce E. Dale, 2003. "Cumulative Energy and Global Warming Impact from the Production of Biomass for Biobased Products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 7(3‐4), pages 147-162, July.
    2. Nalley, Lawton Lanier & Popp, Michael P. & Niederman, Zara & Brye, Kristofor R. & Matlock, Marty B., 2012. "How Potential Carbon Policies Could Affect Where and How Cotton Is Produced in the United States," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 41(2), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Brennan, John P., 1984. "Measuring the Contribution of New Varieties to Increasing Wheat Yields," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(03), pages 1-21, December.
    4. McFadden, Brandon R. & Nalley, L. Lanier & Popp, Michael P., 2013. "How Greenhouse Gas Emission Policy and Industry Pressure Could Affect Producer Selection of Rice Cultivars," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 325-348, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nalley, Lanier & Popp, Michael & Niederman, Z. & Thompson, Jada, 2012. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Labeling for Produce: The Case of Biotech and Conventional Sweet Corn," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 43(3), November.
    2. Devin Moeller & Heidi L. Sieverding & James J. Stone, 2017. "Comparative Farm-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Oilseed Feedstocks in the Northern Great Plains," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Aaron Michael Shew & Alvaro Durand‐Morat & Lawton Lanier Nalley & Karen Ann‐Kuenzel Moldenhauer, 2018. "Estimating the benefits of public plant breeding: beyond profits," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 753-764, November.
    4. Edilegnaw, Wale, 2006. "What do Farmers financially lose if they fail to use improved Seeds? Some Econometric Results for Wheat and Implications for Agricultural Extension Policy in Ethiopia," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 1-81, November.
    5. Derek Byerlee, 1993. "Technical Change and Returns to Wheat Breeding Research in Pakistan's Punjab in the Post-Green Revolution Period," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 69-86.
    6. Nalley, Lawton Lanier & Barkely, Andrew & Watkins, Brad & Hignight, Jeffrey A., 2009. "Enhancing Farm Profitability through Portfolio Analysis: The Case of Spatial Rice Variety Selection," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Barkley, Andrew P. & Chumley, Forrest G., 2012. "A Doubled Haploid Laboratory for Kansas Wheat Breeding: An Economic Analysis of Biotechnology Adoption," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Tsiboe, Francis & Nalley, Lawton Lanier & Durand, Alvaro & Thoma, Greg & Shew, Aaron, 2017. "The Economic and Environmental Benefits of Sheath Blight Resistance in Rice," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(2), May.
    9. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Alberto Pardossi, 2020. "Improving Policy Evidence Base for Agricultural Sustainability and Food Security: A Content Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Lawton Nalley & Francis Tsiboe & Alvaro Durand-Morat & Aaron Shew & Greg Thoma, 2016. "Economic and Environmental Impact of Rice Blast Pathogen (Magnaporthe oryzae) Alleviation in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Kim, Kwansoo & Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2003. "Technological change and risk management: an application to the economics of corn production," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 125-142, October.
    12. Krishna, Vijesh V. & Spielman, David J. & Veettil, Prakashan C. & Ghimire, Subash, 2014. "An empirical examination of the dynamics of varietal turnover in Indian wheat:," IFPRI discussion papers 1336, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Tisboe, Francis & Shew, Aaron & Nalley, Lanier, 2016. "The Economic Impact of Rice Blast Alleviation in the Mid‐South of the United States," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229706, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Barkley, Andrew P., 1997. "Kansas Wheat Breeding: An Economic Analysis," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35929, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Spielman, David J. & Smale, Melinda, 2017. "Policy options to accelerate variety change among smallholder farmers in South Asia and Africa South of the Sahara," IFPRI discussion papers 1666, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Mintewab Bezabih & Remidius Ruhinduka & Mare Sarr, 2016. "Climate change perception and system of rice intensification (SRI) impact on dispersion and downside risk: a moment approximation approach," GRI Working Papers 256, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    17. Parajuli, Ranjan & Dalgaard, Tommy & Jørgensen, Uffe & Adamsen, Anders Peter S. & Knudsen, Marie Trydeman & Birkved, Morten & Gylling, Morten & Schjørring, Jan Kofod, 2015. "Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: a review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 244-263.
    18. Robert S. Frazier & Enze Jin & Ajay Kumar, 2015. "Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    19. McFadden, Brandon R. & Nalley, L. Lanier & Popp, Michael P., 2013. "How Greenhouse Gas Emission Policy and Industry Pressure Could Affect Producer Selection of Rice Cultivars," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 42(2), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Qian, J. & Zhao, Z., 2018. "Estimating the Contribution of New Seed Cultivars to Crop Yield Increases: Method and Application," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277236, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:155428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.