IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/274547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ідентифікація Проблем І Перспективи Розвитку Соціальної Інфраструктури Сільських Територій України

Author

Listed:
  • Tymoshenko, Mykola

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of paper is to assess the current state of the social infrastructure of Ukrainian rural areas, identify problems and justify strategic development benchmarks based on a correlation and regression analysis of the dependence of the sustainability of rural development on social conditions. Methodology / approach. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is the dialectic, systemic and synergetic scientific approaches, the use of which in the study of rural development is due to the orientation towards the construction of a European-oriented society in Ukraine. In the process of research, the following scientific methods have been used: abstract-logical, in particular methods of induction and deduction, analogy and comparison; operationalization of concepts; method of theoretical generalization and analysis and synthesis; various methods of the economic-statistical method (statistical observation, comparison, tabular); correlation-regression analysis, etc. Results. The article describes the scientific and theoretical principles of the formation and development of the social infrastructure of the village as an important factor ensuring the socio-cultural and housing and living conditions of the rural population in order to guarantee the reproduction of the labor force and increase the quality of life of the rural population. It was established that during the period of the market transformation of the agrarian sector, the destruction of the social sphere of the village took place, which resulted from the unsystematic, non-complex and often unprofessional solution of the problems of agrarian reform in Ukraine. It is proved that the correlation-regression model of quantitative assessment allows us to determine the extent and priority of the influence of certain exogenous and endogenous factors on the sustainability of rural areas development, and, as a result, provide an effective solution to the identified problems. The originality / scientific novelty of the results is to improve the methodological approach to the comprehensive assessment of the socio-economic status of rural areas based on the use of multi-factor correlation-regression models and to determine the correlation of the relationship between social factors that directly affect the sustainability of rural development. Practical value / implications is that the obtained results will contribute to the development of clear benchmarks for the introduction of new and upgrading of existing institutions, organizations and agencies of all sectors of social services, engineering communications, etc., which would provide a qualitatively new standard of living and well-being of rural inhabitants.

Suggested Citation

  • Tymoshenko, Mykola, 2018. "Ідентифікація Проблем І Перспективи Розвитку Соціальної Інфраструктури Сільських Територій України," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 4(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:274547
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/274547/files/9_Tymoshenko_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.274547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Navarro Francisco & Labianca Marilena & Cejudo Eugenio & de Rubertis Stefano & Salento Angelo & Maroto Juan Carlos & Belliggiano Angelo, 2018. "Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 107-126, March.
    2. Terry Marsden & Jo Banks & Gillian Bristow, 2002. "The Social Management of Rural Nature: Understanding Agrarian-Based Rural Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(5), pages 809-825, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Megan Swindal & Gilbert Gillespie & Rick Welsh, 2010. "Community digester operations and dairy farmer perspectives," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(4), pages 461-474, December.
    2. Tulla Antoni F., 2019. "Sustainable Rural Development Requires Value-Added Activities Linked with Comparative Advantage: The Case of the Catalan Pyrenees," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 229-256, June.
    3. Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Kristensen, Søren Bech Pilgaard & Præstholm, Søren & Busck, Anne Gravsholt & Winther, Lars & Fertner, Christian & Vesterager, Jens Peter & Vejre, Henrik, 2019. "On-farm Business Structure Diversification in Greater Copenhagen—Farmers in an urban landscape or entrepreneurs in a rural landscape?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Ana Nieto Masot & Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Luis Manuel Costa Moreno, 2019. "Principal Component Analysis of the LEADER Approach (2007–2013) in South Western Europe (Extremadura and Alentejo)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Julian Clark, 2006. "The Institutional Limits to Multifunctional Agriculture: Subnational Governance and Regional Systems of Innovation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(3), pages 331-349, June.
    7. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Enabling Factors for Better Multiplier Effects of the LEADER Programme: Lessons from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Pato Lúcia, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation Towards Rural Development Evidence from a Peripheral Area in Portugal," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 209-220, June.
    9. Brian Ilbery & Damian Maye, 2005. "Alternative (Shorter) Food Supply Chains and Specialist Livestock Products in the Scottish–English Borders," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(5), pages 823-844, May.
    10. Gianpaolo Basile & Aurora Cavallo, 2020. "Rural Identity, Authenticity, and Sustainability in Italian Inner Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Natallya Levino & Madson Monte & Carlos Costa & Walter Lima Filho, 2022. "A Multi-Methodological Analysis of Jabuticaba’s Supply Chain in an Agricultural Cooperative Production," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Thi Nga Bui & An Ha Nguyen & Thi Thu Huong Le & Van Phuong Nguyen & Thi Thanh Hao Le & Thi Thanh Huyen Tran & Ngoc Mai Nguyen & Thi Kim Oanh Le & Thi Kim Oanh Nguyen & Thi Thu Trang Nguyen & Hong Van , 2021. "Can a Short Food Supply Chain Create Sustainable Benefits for Small Farmers in Developing Countries? An Exploratory Study of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Romina D’Ascanio & Lorenzo Barbieri & Giorgia De Pasquale & Andrea Filpa & Anna Laura Palazzo, 2021. "Landscape Works. Balancing Nature and Culture in the Pantelleria National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Ievoli Corrado & Belliggiano Angelo & Marandola Danilo & Milone Pierluigi & Ventura Flaminia, 2019. "Information and Communication Infrastructures and New Business Models in Rural Areas: The Case of Molise Region in Italy," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(4), pages 475-496, December.
    15. Alfredo J. Escribano, 2016. "Beef Cattle Farms’ Conversion to the Organic System. Recommendations for Success in the Face of Future Changes in a Global Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-23, June.
    16. O'Rourke Eileen & Kramm Nadine, 2012. "High nature value (HNV) farming and the management of upland diversity. A review," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 116-133, January.
    17. Casolani, Nicola & Nissi, Eugenia & Giampaolo, Antonio & Liberatore, Lolita, 2021. "Evaluating the effects of European support measures for Italian organic farms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Belliggiano Angelo & Sturla Alberto & Vassallo Marco & Viganò Laura, 2020. "Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in Favor of Organic Farming: Two Case Studies from Italian Fragile Areas," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, March.
    19. Corsi, Alessandro & Frontuto, Vito & Novelli, Silvia, 2022. "Relational goods and direct purchase from farmers: estimating the value of the relationship between consumers and producers," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(2), March.
    20. Miloslav LAPKA & Eva CUDLÍNOVÁ & J. Sanford RIKOON & Martin PĚLUCHA & Viktor KVETOŇ, 2011. "Rural development in the context of agricultural "green" subsidies: Czech farmers' responses," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(6), pages 259-271.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:274547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.