IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v23y2021ispecial15p948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Development Disparities in the EU-27 Based on R&D and Innovation Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Marius Constantin

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihai Dinu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Simona Roxana Patarlageanu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristian Chelariu

    (Suffolk University, Boston, Massachuseetts, USA)

Abstract

Ever since it was adopted in 2015 by the United Nations, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development has acted as the main guideline for European Union Member States in regard to achieving economic prosperity, environmental sustainability and peaceful, inclusive and innovative societies. However, in the race for sustainable development, some European Union Member States are ahead of the others – not only as far as meeting the Sustainable Development Goals is concerned, but from the perspective of the R&D and innovation factors as well. In this context, the objective of this research was to explore sustainable development disparities between the EU-27 Members, based on the previously mentioned factors. A cross-sectional multiple linear regression model was constructed to facilitate an in-depth look at the observations. The econometric analysis was carried out based on the Global SDG Index, the Global Innovation Index and on the percentage of the GDP allocated to R&D activities. Although the transition to the sustainable development model requires modern and disruptive approaches at country level, the literature is not rich on papers fully covering the nature of the existing links between the variables analyzed in the proposed econometric model. Results show that countries from Northern and Westeren Europe are leading the change to a more innovative and sustainable path for the European Union. This implies the responsibility of high levels of R&D expenditure. Although no European country is on track on meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, Central and Eastern European Countries have made a lot of catching up to the Northwestern European leaders. The results of this research help decision-makers improve their strategies by understanding the impact of R&D and innovation factors on meeting sustainable development throughout EU-27 at an equitable pace for all European members.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius Constantin & Mihai Dinu & Simona Roxana Patarlageanu & Cristian Chelariu, 2021. "Sustainable Development Disparities in the EU-27 Based on R&D and Innovation Factors," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(Special15), pages 948-948, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:23:y:2021:i:special15:p:948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3050.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marieta Olaru & Vasile Dinu & Timo Keppler & Bogdan Mocan, 2015. "Study on the Open Innovation Practices in Romanian Smes," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(Special 9), pages 1129-1129, November.
    2. Maria-Floriana Popescu & Bogdan-Cristian Chiripuci & Andreea Orîndaru & Marius Constantin & Albert Scrieciu, 2020. "Fostering Sustainable Development through Shifting Toward Rural Areas and Digitalization—The Case of Romanian Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Roxana Voicu-Dorobanțu & Clara Volintiru & Maria-Floriana Popescu & Vlad Nerău & George Ștefan, 2021. "Tackling Complexity of the Just Transition in the EU: Evidence from Romania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Cheba, Katarzyna & Bąk, Iwona & Kiba-Janiak, Maja & Saniuk, Sebastian & Dembińska, Izabela & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2017. "The application of relative taxonomy to the study of disproportions in the area of sustainable development of the European Union," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 481-491.
    5. Carmen Păunescu & Mihaela Cornelia Popescu & Matthias Duennweber, 2018. "Factors Determining Desirability of Entrepreneurship in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Vasilis Sarafidis & Tom Wansbeek, 2012. "Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel Data Analysis," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 483-531, September.
    7. Ramona Pîrvu & Cristian Drăgan & Gheorghe Axinte & Sorin Dinulescu & Mihaela Lupăncescu & Andra Găină, 2019. "The Impact of the Implementation of Cohesion Policy on the Sustainable Development of EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, August.
    8. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Halkos, George & Moll de Alba, Jaime & Todorov, Valentin, 2021. "Analyzing manufacturing sector and selected development challenges: A panel data analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Arbolino, Roberta & Boffardi, Raffaele & Lanuzza, Francesco & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2018. "Monitoring and evaluation of regional industrial sustainability: Evidence from Italian regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 420-428.
    3. Radu Petrariu & Marius Constantin & Mihai Dinu & Simona Roxana Pătărlăgeanu & Mădălina Elena Deaconu, 2021. "Water, Energy, Food, Waste Nexus: Between Synergy and Trade-Offs in Romania Based on Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    4. David Okoti & Dr. Robert O. Kati & Dr. Rose Mutende, 2022. "Structure and Content of Sports Training Curriculum and its Association with Athletes’ Achievement in Sports Academies in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(7), pages 383-390, July.
    5. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    7. Francesca Ciampa & Katia Fabbricatti & Gianluigi Freda & Maria Rita Pinto, 2024. "A Playground and Arts for a Community in Transition: A Circular Model for Built Heritage Regeneration in the Sanità District (Naples, Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Arturas Juodis, 2013. "Cointegration Testing in Panel VAR Models Under Partial Identification and Spatial Dependence," UvA-Econometrics Working Papers 13-08, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Dept. of Econometrics.
    9. Godwell Nhamo & Charles Nhemachena & Senia Nhamo, 2020. "Using ICT indicators to measure readiness of countries to implement Industry 4.0 and the SDGs," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 22(2), pages 315-337, April.
    10. Jonathan Glennie & Nilima Gulrajani & Andy Sumner & Myles Wickstead, 2019. "A proposal for a new universal development commitment," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-119, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    12. Concepción de la Fuente-Cabrero & Mónica de Castro-Pardo & Rosa Santero-Sánchez & Pilar Laguna-Sánchez, 2019. "The Role of Mutual Guarantee Institutions in the Financial Sustainability of New Family-Owned Small Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Jean-Louis Combes & Alexandru Minea & Pegdéwendé Nestor Sawadogo, 2019. "Assessing the effects of combating illicit financial flows on domestic tax revenue mobilization in developing countries," CERDI Working papers halshs-02019073, HAL.
    14. N. Keating, 2022. "A research framework for the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021–2030)," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 775-787, September.
    15. Hussain Zaid H Alsharif & Shu Tong, 2019. "Green Product Innovation Strategies for Environmental Sustainability in the Construction Sector," Journal of Contemporary Research in Social Sciences, Michael Laurence, vol. 1(6), pages 126-135.
    16. Odusanya Ibrahim Abidemi & Akinlo Anthony Enisan, 2020. "Growth effect of income inequality in sub-Saharan Africa: exploring the transmission channels," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 56(2), pages 176-190, June.
    17. Hrabrin Bachev, 2017. "A Multicriteria Assessment of the Sustainability of Governing Structures in Bulgarian Agriculture," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 3(3), pages 194-222.
    18. Angela Luci-Greulich & Olivier Thévenon, 2014. "Does Economic Advancement ‘Cause’ a Re-increase in Fertility? An Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries (1960–2007)," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 30(2), pages 187-221, May.
    19. Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur, 2021. "An appraisal of interlinkages between macro-economic indicators of economic well-being and the sustainable development goals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Manisha Jain, 2022. "Energy efficiency targets and tracking savings: Measurement issues in developing economies," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2022-015, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sustainability; sustainable development disparities; research and development; innovation; budgetary allocation; policy harmonization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:23:y:2021:i:special15:p:948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.