IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v22y2020i55p726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management Implementation for Sustainable Development of Romanian SMEs: A Fuzzy Approach ...........

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Nadia Ciocoiu

    (University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adina Liliana Prioteasa

    (University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Sofia Elena Colesca

    (University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are recognized for their major contribution to the economic development of any country. In Romania, SMEs represent 99.7% of all organizations and employ approximately 66% of all nationally registered employees, percentages approximately equal to those recorded in the European Union. However, the productivity of Romanian SMEs is quite low, feeling very strong any influence from the external environment. Risk management is increasingly considered a tool that can contribute to the sustainable development of SMEs. The implementation of a risk management system is a complex process, influenced by many factors. In this context, the objective of the present article is to analyze the determinants of behavior towards the implementation of risk management in Romanian SMEs. The data for the analysis were obtained through a questionnaire addressed to SMEs and processed by a fuzzy model. The results revealed two essential ideas: (1) the determinants of SMEs behavior towards risk management implementation are: stakeholders’ requirements, training in risk management, the existence of a leader for the implementation and attitude towards risk; (2) attitude toward risk is influenced by the business lifespan and awareness of the importance of risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Nadia Ciocoiu & Adina Liliana Prioteasa & Sofia Elena Colesca, 2020. "Risk Management Implementation for Sustainable Development of Romanian SMEs: A Fuzzy Approach ...........," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(55), pages 726-726, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:22:y:2020:i:55:p:726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2927.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. M. Taheri & G. Hesamian & R. Viertl, 2016. "Contingency tables with fuzzy information," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(20), pages 5906-5917, October.
    2. Anne E. Kleffner & Ryan B. Lee & Bill McGannon, 2003. "The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Use of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence From Canada," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 6(1), pages 53-73, February.
    3. Anna A. MIKHAYLOVA & Andrey S. MIKHAYLOV & Andrey S. MIKHAYLOV & Oksana V. SAVCHINA & Angelina P. PLOTNIKOVA, 2019. "Innovation Landscape Of The Baltic Region," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 165-180, December.
    4. Paul MARINESCU & Ionut CONSTANTIN & Sorin-George TOMA, 2016. "Creativity, Innovation and the Perspectives of Management," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(2), pages 71-81, December.
    5. Stephen Gates, 2006. "Incorporating strategic risk into enterprise risk management: A Survey of Current Corporate Practice," Post-Print hal-00796835, HAL.
    6. Beasley, Mark S. & Clune, Richard & Hermanson, Dana R., 2005. "Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 521-531.
    7. Sofia Elena COLESCA & Mihaela PACESILA & Stefan Gabriel BURCEA & Carmen Nadia CIOCOIU & Mihai BUGHEANU, 2017. "Analysis of Passenger’s Satisfaction with the Quality of the Public Transportation Mode Choices in Bucharest: A Fuzzy Approach," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(4), pages 109-125.
    8. Robert E. Hoyt & Andre P. Liebenberg, 2011. "The Value of Enterprise Risk Management," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(4), pages 795-822, December.
    9. Kim, Kwang Jae & Moskowitz, Herbert & Koksalan, Murat, 1996. "Fuzzy versus statistical linear regression," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 417-434, July.
    10. Stephen Gates, 2006. "Incorporating Strategic Risk into Enterprise Risk Management: A Survey of Current Corporate Practice," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 18(4), pages 81-90, September.
    11. Stephen Gates, 2006. "Incorporating strategic risk into enterprise risk management," Post-Print hal-00757920, HAL.
    12. Betim RETKOCERI & Rinor KURTESHI, 2019. "Understanding The Current Status Of Innovation Management Practices In Kosovo Firms," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 43-55, March.
    13. Niam Yaraghi & Roland G. Langhe, 2011. "Critical success factors for risk management systems," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 551-581, May.
    14. Gennady M. FEDOROV & Andrey S. MIKHAYLOV, 2019. "Socioeconomic Asymmetry In Regional Development Across Russia," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(4), pages 35-52, November.
    15. Fraser, John R.S. & Simkins, Betty J., 2016. "The challenges of and solutions for implementing enterprise risk management," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 689-698.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreja Mihailović & Julija Cerović Smolović & Ivan Radević & Neli Rašović & Nikola Martinović, 2021. "COVID-19 and Beyond: Employee Perceptions of the Efficiency of Teleworking and Its Cybersecurity Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Adela JANSEN & Corina Daniela BOGHEANU & Iudith Anci KIS & Mădălina TABARCIA & Madlena NEN, 2023. "Assertive Managerial Communication: A Purposeful Factor For Career Success During Covid-19 Times," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 34-49, March.
    3. Simona Catalina ?TEFAN & Cezar-Petre SIMION & ?tefan Catalin POPA & Catalina Florentina ALBU & Ana-Madalina POTCOVARU, 2020. "Enablers And Barriers Of Technology Transfer In Romanian Organizations In The Context Of The Knowledge-Based Economy: A Factor Analysis," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(4), pages 40-48, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eckles, David L. & Hoyt, Robert E. & Miller, Steve M., 2014. "Reprint of: The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 409-423.
    2. Eckles, David L. & Hoyt, Robert E. & Miller, Steve M., 2014. "The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 247-261.
    3. Therese R. Viscelli & Mark S. Beasley & Dana R. Hermanson, 2016. "Research Insights About Risk Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    4. Mónica Hernández-Madrigal & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán & Élfego Ramírez-Flores, 2020. "Are external pressures always behind ERM implementation? Evidence from Spanish listed firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 86-100, September.
    5. Danijela Miloš Sprčić & Marina Mešin Žagar & Željko Šević & Mojca Marc, 2016. "Does enterprise risk management influence market value – A long-term perspective," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 65-88, August.
    6. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Andrew F. Whitman, 2015. "Is ERM Legally Required? Yes for Financial and Governmental Institutions, No for Private Enterprises," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 18(2), pages 161-197, September.
    8. Madhu Acharyya & Chris Brady, 2014. "Designing an Enterprise Risk Management Curriculum for Business Studies: Insights From a Pilot Program," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(1), pages 113-136, March.
    9. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Zaman, Mahbub & Buckby, Sherrena, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    10. René Aïd, 2008. "Long-term risk management for utility companies: the next challenges," Working Papers hal-00409030, HAL.
    11. Levente Bakos & Dănuț Dumitru Dumitrașcu, 2021. "Decentralized Enterprise Risk Management Issues under Rapidly Changing Environments," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Ousmane COUNDOUL & Massene GADIAGA & Anne-Marie GEOURJON & Bertrand LAPORTE, 2012. "Inspecting less to inspect better: The use of data mining for risk management by customs administrations," Working Papers P46, FERDI.
    13. Ivana Dvorski Lacković & Nataša Kurnoga & Danijela Miloš Sprčić, 2022. "Three-factor model of Enterprise Risk Management implementation: exploratory study of non-financial companies," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 101-122, June.
    14. Arena, Marika & Arnaboldi, Michela & Azzone, Giovanni, 2010. "The organizational dynamics of Enterprise Risk Management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 659-675, October.
    15. Bertrand LAPORTE & Anne-Marie GEOURJON & Massene GADIAGA & Ousmane COUNDOUL, 2012. "Contrôler moins pour contrôler mieux : L’utilisation du data mining pour la gestion du risque en douane," Working Papers 201206, CERDI.
    16. Zhu, Delong & Li, Zhe & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj, 2023. "Evaluation of the critical success factors of dynamic enterprise risk management in manufacturing SMEs using an integrated fuzzy decision-making model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    17. Muhammed Altuntas & Thomas R. Berry-Stölzle & J. David Cummins, 2021. "Enterprise risk management and economies of scale and scope: evidence from the German insurance industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 811-845, April.
    18. Posch, Arthur, 2020. "Integrating risk into control system design: The complementarity between risk-focused results controls and risk-focused information sharing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    19. Farrell, Mark & Gallagher, Ronan, 2019. "Moderating influences on the ERM maturity-performance relationship," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 616-628.
    20. Olayinka Adedayo Erin & Adebola Daniel Kolawole & Abdurafiu Olaiya Noah, 2020. "Risk governance and cybercrime: the hierarchical regression approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    small and medium-sized enterprises; integrated risk management; fuzzy approach; attitude towards risk; behavior; sustainable development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:22:y:2020:i:55:p:726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.