IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rmgtin/v6y2003i1p53-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Use of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence From Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Anne E. Kleffner
  • Ryan B. Lee
  • Bill McGannon

Abstract

This article examines the use of enterprise risk management (ERM) by companies in Canada, the characteristics that are associated with the use of ERM, what obstacles companies face in implementing ERM, and what role, if any, corporate governance guidelines have played in the decision to adopt ERM. We obtained our data from the responses to a mail survey sent to Canadian Risk and Insurance Management Society members as well as telephone interviews with 19 of the respondents. The results indicate that 31 percent of the sample had adopted ERM and that reasons for adopting ERM include the influence of the risk manager (61 percent), encouragement from the board of directors (51 percent), and compliance with Toronto Stock Exchange (TSE) guidelines (37 percent). The major deterrents to ERM were an organizational structure that discourages ERM and an overall resistance to change. Although only about one‐third of companies indicated that they had adopted an ERM approach, evidence was clear that a larger portion of the sample was moving in that direction, as indicated by what changes they had observed in their companies in the past three years. These include the development of company‐wide guidelines for risk management (45 percent), an increased awareness of nonoperational risks by operational risk management personnel and an increased awareness of operational risks by nonoperational risk management personnel (49 percent), more coordination with different areas responsible for risk management (64 percent), and more involvement and interaction in the decision making of other departments. Contrary to what we expected, there was not a significant difference between firms that are listed on the TSE versus those that are not in terms of the propensity to use ERM. However, the fact that 37 percent of firms indicated that the TSE guidelines were influential in their decision to adopt ERM provides some evidence that the guidelines are influencing companies’ risk management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne E. Kleffner & Ryan B. Lee & Bill McGannon, 2003. "The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Use of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence From Canada," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 6(1), pages 53-73, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:6:y:2003:i:1:p:53-73
    DOI: 1098-1616.00020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1098-1616.00020
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/1098-1616.00020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Lee Colquitt & Robert E. Hoyt & Ryan B. Lee, 1999. "Integrated Risk Management and the Role of the Risk Manager," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 2(3), pages 43-61, September.
    2. Scott E. Harrington & Greg Niehaus & Kenneth J. Risko, 2002. "Enterprise Risk Management: The Case Of United Grain Growers," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 14(4), pages 71-81, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monda, Barbara & Giorgino, Marco & Modolin, Ileana, 2013. "Rationales for Corporate Risk Management - A Critical Literature Review," MPRA Paper 45420, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Lingyun Xiong & Lijuan Xiao & Min Bai & Yafeng Qin & Lijuan Yang, 2023. "The religion effect on corporate cash holding in China: Buddhism and Taoism," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 4420-4457, October.
    3. J. Tim Query, 2000. "The Role Of The Risk Manager In A University Setting," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 3(2), pages 219-236, September.
    4. Evan M. Eastman & Jianren Xu, 2021. "Market reactions to enterprise risk management adoption, incorporation by rating agencies, and ORSA Act passage," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(2), pages 151-180, June.
    5. Jianxiong Chen & Chung-Cheng Yang, 2021. "Competitive Revenue Strategies in the Medical Consumables Industry: Evidence from Human Resources, Research and Development Expenses and Industry Life Cycle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Abdullah Mohammed Alzharani & Abdullah Mohammed Alzharani, 2015. "An Empirical Investigation Of Audit Committee Effectiveness And Risk Management: Evidence From Saudi Arabia," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(1), pages 39-49.
    7. Eckles, David L. & Hoyt, Robert E. & Miller, Steve M., 2014. "Reprint of: The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 409-423.
    8. Chien-Ming Huang & Wei Yang & Ren-Qing Zeng, 2020. "Analysis on the Efficiency of Risk Management in the Chinese Listed Companies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-13, October.
    9. André P. Liebenberg & Robert E. Hoyt, 2003. "The Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence From the Appointment of Chief Risk Officers," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 6(1), pages 37-52, February.
    10. René-Pascal van den Boom, 2020. "Financial Risk Management in SMEs: A New Conceptual Framework," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(10), pages 1-85, October.
    11. Eckles, David L. & Hoyt, Robert E. & Miller, Steve M., 2014. "The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 247-261.
    12. Puan Yatim, 2010. "Board structures and the establishment of a risk management committee by Malaysian listed firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(1), pages 17-36, February.
    13. Abol Jalilvand & Sidharth Moorthy, 2023. "Triangulating Risk Profile and Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Implementing Enterprise Risk Management System," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Norma L. Nielson & Anne E. Kleffner & Ryan B. Lee, 2005. "The Evolution of the Role of Risk Communication in Effective Risk Management," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 8(2), pages 279-289, September.
    15. Dionne, Georges & Harrington, Scott, 2017. "Insurance and Insurance Markets," Working Papers 17-2, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    16. Sara Faedfar & Mustafa Özyeşil & Mustafa Çıkrıkçı & Esin Benhür Aktürk, 2022. "Effective Risk Management and Sustainable Corporate Performance Integrating Innovation and Intellectual Capital: An Application on Istanbul Exchange Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Muhammed Altuntas & Thomas R. Berry-Stölzle & J. David Cummins, 2021. "Enterprise risk management and economies of scale and scope: evidence from the German insurance industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 811-845, April.
    18. Lewis, Yimai & Bozos, Konstantinos, 2019. "Mitigating post-acquisition risk: the interplay of cross-border uncertainties," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 1-1.
    19. Therese R. Viscelli & Mark S. Beasley & Dana R. Hermanson, 2016. "Research Insights About Risk Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    20. Simon Gollisch & Barbara Hedderich & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2016. "Reference points and risky decision-making in agricultural trade firms: A case study in Germany," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260773, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:6:y:2003:i:1:p:53-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1098-1616 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.