IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ach/journl/y2018id674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodical aspects problems of harmonization of interests within the framework of the challenge of the selection of the strategic priorities of regional development

Author

Listed:
  • M. M. Nizamutdinov
  • V. V. Oreshnikov

Abstract

The article explores the problem of forming strategies for the development of territorial socioeconomic systems based on the interaction of differentlevel economic agents. The study proposes the development of a model tool for territorial development based on the formalization of the principles of interaction between different-level economic agents and the mechanisms for managing their behavior with a view to forming an agreed vector of strategic development of territorial socio-economic systems. A general scheme for the functioning of the territorial socio-economic system from the point of view of forming and realizing the interests of agents is proposed, and key stages of this process are highlighted. The characteristics that make it possible to classify interests are considered. The review of approaches to the coordination of interests of economic agents is carried out, their opportunities and restrictions are revealed.A conceptual model of coordinating the interests of economic agents based on ranking the priority and degree of realization of the key interests of agents using the fuzzy logic apparatus is proposed and allows to formulate an acceptable set of solutions of varying degree of consistency («soft» solutions) in the situation when counterparts can not reach an unequivocally agreed decision. Within the framework of implementation of fuzzy logic methods, appropriate linguistic variables and interval values are proposed to determine these terms. An approach is proposed to determine the degree of coherence of counterparties’ interests. Based on the results of assessing the level of coherence of interests of economic agents, two decisions can be obtained: 1) the level of coherence of interests is sufficient for the realization of interests; 2) the level of coherence of interests is insufficient and requires the adjustment of some parameters. The most interesting is the option, implying the formation of concessions, since it is in this case that there is a direct coordination of the interests of economic agents. The criteria for the formation of the corresponding fuzzy rules are proposed. The implementation of this algorithm will allow to obtain a pair of coordinated interests of agents by forming mutual concessions or to reveal the impossibility of such a solution to the problem.

Suggested Citation

  • M. M. Nizamutdinov & V. V. Oreshnikov, 2018. "Methodical aspects problems of harmonization of interests within the framework of the challenge of the selection of the strategic priorities of regional development," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 11(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2018:id:674
    DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2018-2-185-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecoprom.misis.ru/jour/article/viewFile/674/610
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-2-185-194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lambert Schneider & Michael Lazarus & Carrie Lee & Harro van Asselt, 2017. "Restricted linking of emissions trading systems: options, benefits, and challenges," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 883-898, December.
    2. Heather Grabbe & Henning Meyer & Diego Valiante, 2012. "Citizens’ Europe: Crowded out by economic focus," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 47(5), pages 268-281, September.
    3. repec:srs:journl:jarle:v:7:y:2016:i:3:p:586-589 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Anara N NIYAZOVA & Maidan K SULEIMENOV & Kulyash M ILYASSOVA & Gulzhaukhar T KAZIYEVA & Salima A SARINA, 2016. "Land Proprietary Rights and Limitations in Private and Public Interests," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 586-589.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Quemin & Christian Perthuis, 2019. "Transitional Restricted Linkage Between Emissions Trading Schemes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Li, Mengyu & Weng, Yuyan & Duan, Maosheng, 2019. "Emissions, energy and economic impacts of linking China’s national ETS with the EU ETS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1235-1244.
    3. Woerman, Matt, 2023. "Linking carbon markets with different initial conditions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Fang, Chenhao & Ma, Tieju, 2020. "Stylized agent-based modeling on linking emission trading systems and its implications for China's practice," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Wang, Xu & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2018. "Transaction costs, market structure and efficient coverage of emissions trading scheme: A microlevel study from the pilots in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 657-671.
    6. Stefano F. Verde & Simone Borghesi, 2022. "The International Dimension of the EU Emissions Trading System: Bringing the Pieces Together," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(1), pages 23-46, September.
    7. Li, Mengyu & Duan, Maosheng, 2021. "Exploring linkage opportunities for China's emissions trading system under the Paris targets——EU-China and Japan-Korea-China cases," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Wang-Helmreich, Hanna & Kreibich, Nicolas, 2019. "The potential impacts of a domestic offset component in a carbon tax on mitigation of national emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 453-460.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2018:id:674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Главный контакт редакции (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://misis.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.