IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aae/journl/v16y2020i4p149-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A person-organization fit Model of Generation Z: Preliminary studies

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska

    (Assistant Professor, Poznań University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Management, ul. Jacka Rychlewskiego 2, 60-965 Poznań, Poland)

  • G. Scott Erickson

    (the Charles A. Data Professor, School of Business at Ithaca College, 953 Danby Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, (607) 274-3011, USA)

Abstract

The study looks at developing a person-organization fit model based on the unique characteristics of the new generational cohort, Generation Z, now entering the workforce. Theory suggests competitive advantage may come to a firm based on its unique human capital, the human resources it employs and develops. Further, organizations will be more successful in attracting the valuable employees they seek if they can provide a workplace appealing to them in terms of organizational values, culture, and other aspects that may also include more familiar enticements such as pay and benefits. To address the gap, this pioneering study investigates the context of person-organizational culture for the Z Generation entering the labor market. The key questions answered by the authors when describing the Person-Organization Fit Framework for Generation Z include the differences in how organizational culture appeals to Gen Z men and Gen Z women. The research results are presented in three steps: an analysis of workplace environment elements for Gen Z, correlation analysis between the workplace environment elements required by Gen Z, and presentation of a Person-Organization Fit Framework for Gen Z. From a sample of 3393 students at technological secondary schools in the Wielkopolska Region, the survey results provided evidence of the workplace preferences for this cohort. In addition, results were further analyzed for differences in gender and intended profession. For this region, Generation Z has variable individual needs and wants, some of which can be easily identified (gender, profession) but some of which may be less clear. These research results may be used for designing appealing workplaces taking into account person-organization needs for young people. Based on this novel research, organizations employing the resulting work framework for Gen Z will be better prepared to consider the nature and communication of what they have to offer as well as how they can be flexible in adapting these offerings to unique individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska & G. Scott Erickson, 2020. "A person-organization fit Model of Generation Z: Preliminary studies," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 16(4), pages 149-176.
  • Handle: RePEc:aae:journl:v:16:y:2020:i:4:p:149-176
    DOI: 10.7341/20201645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jemi.edu.pl/uploadedFiles/file/all-issues/vol16/issue4/JEMI_Vol16_Issue4_2020_Article5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7341/20201645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Asrar-ul-Haq & Sadia Anwar, 2016. "A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1127744-112, December.
    2. Darwis Agustriyana & Gusni & Didi Tarmidi & Dinda Kayani Putri Bestari, 2019. "Organization Culture - Oriented Training Design," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 82-91, August.
    3. Wioleta Kucharska & Rafał Kowalczyk, 2019. "How to achieve sustainability?—Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 453-467, March.
    4. Maiju Kangas & Joona Muotka & Mari Huhtala & Anne Mäkikangas & Taru Feldt, 2017. "Is the Ethical Culture of the Organization Associated with Sickness Absence? A Multilevel Analysis in a Public Sector Organization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 131-145, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alla Sulyma, 2022. "Klasyfikacja barier komunikacyjnych z pokoleniem Z w miejscu pracy," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 2, pages 13-28.
    2. Hazem Ali & Min Li & Xunmin Qiu, 2024. "Examination of HRM practices in relation to the retention of Chinese Gen Z employees," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Lazar Mihai-Alin & Zbuchea Alexandra & Pînzaru Florina, 2023. "The Emerging Generation Z Workforce in the Digital World: A Literature Review on Cooperation and Transformation," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1991-2001, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimiliano Cerciello & Francesco Busato & Simone Taddeo, 2023. "The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability. Accounting for strategic disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 802-819, March.
    2. Migchelbrink, Koen & Raymaekers, Pieter, 2023. "Nudging people to pay their parking fines on time. Evidence from a cluster-randomized field experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Saliha Gul Abbasi & Mazhar Abbas & Mahir Pradana & Serhan Abdullah Salem Al-Shammari & Umer Zaman & Muhammad Shahid Nawaz, 2021. "Impact of Organizational and Individual Factors on Knowledge Sharing Behavior: Social Capital Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    4. Ting Nie & Yanli Gui & Yiying Huang, 2024. "Online sharing behaviors driven by need for approval: the choice of individuals with low social intelligence and high gratitude?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Wioleta Kucharska, 2020. "Employee Commitment Matters for CSR Practice, Reputation and Corporate Brand Performance—European Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Yusuf Iskandar & Joeliaty & Umi Kaltum & Hilmiana, 2021. "The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Performance of Social Enterprises: A Literature Review," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, September.
    7. Anup Raj & Andrei Kuznetsov & Thankom Gopinath Arun, 2020. "Culture of Sustainability and Marketing Orientation of Indian Agribusiness in implementing CSR Programs—Insights from Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Hajir Al-Mawali & Kamla Ali Al-Busaidi, 2022. "Knowledge Sharing Through Enterprise Social Media in a Telecommunications Context," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 18(1), pages 1-27, January.
    9. Eduardo Jiménez & Marta de la Cuesta-González & Montserrat Boronat-Navarro, 2021. "How Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Can Uptake the Sustainable Development Goals through a Cluster Management Organization: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Appel Mahmud & Donghong Ding & Md. Morshadul Hasan, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    11. Nicola Raimo & Angela Rella & Filippo Vitolla & María-Inés Sánchez-Vicente & Isabel-María García-Sánchez, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: A Traditional Way to Address New Social Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Linghui Kong & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Naveed Ahmad & Mariana Sehleanu & Zhihui Li & Malik Zia-Ud-Din & Daniel Badulescu, 2021. "CSR as a Potential Motivator to Shape Employees’ View towards Nature for a Sustainable Workplace Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, February.
    13. Rafał Kowalczyk & Wioleta Kucharska, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility practices incomes and outcomes: Stakeholders' pressure, culture, employee commitment, corporate reputation, and brand performance. A Polish–German cross‐country study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 595-615, March.
    14. Tran Huy Phuong, 2019. "How authentic leadership promotes individual knowledge sharing: viewing from the lens of COR theory," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 386-401, December.
    15. Silvia Rita Sedita & Silvia Blasi & Jiawen Yang, 2022. "The cultural dimensions of sustainable development: A cross‐country configurational analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1838-1849, December.
    16. Juliana Toro-Arias & Pablo Ruiz-Palomino & María Pilar Rodríguez-Córdoba, 2022. "Measuring Ethical Organizational Culture: Validation of the Spanish Version of the Shortened Corporate Ethical Virtues Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 551-574, March.
    17. repec:gdk:wpaper:65 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Kathryn Cormican & Chen Meng & Suzana Sampaio & Qiong Wu, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Knowledge Sharing Practices: An Analysis of Organizational Level Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Zdeněk Mikulka & Ivana Nekvapilová & Jolana Fedorková, 2020. "The Moral-Value Orientation—A Prerequisite for Sustainable Development of the Corporate Social Responsibility of a Security Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Alexandre Di Miceli da Silveira, 2022. "Corporate governance and ethical culture: Do boards matter?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1085-1116, May.
    21. Natalia Aversano & Ferdinando Di Carlo & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini & Rosa Lombardi, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, and universities: New evidence from the Italian scenario," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1892-1899, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aae:journl:v:16:y:2020:i:4:p:149-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Ujwary-Gil (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://fundacjacognitione.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.