IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/top/old/1604/top.thailand.html
 

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Thailand, as of April 2016

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Thailand, there are 75 authors affiliated with 32 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to the weights they have set to each in their profile, or by default according to a formula described here.

All institutions in this region.

Top 25% institutions in Thailand

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[1]Bank of Thailand

Bangkok, Thailand

1.7443.5
2[2]Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University

Bangkok, Thailand

1.97109.3
3[3]Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), United Nations

Bangkok, Thailand

2.05129.74
4[4]School of Development Economics, National Institute of Development Administration

Bangkok, Thailand

4.4133
5[5]College of Management, Mahidol University

Bangkok, Thailand

4.8410.9
6[6]School of Economics, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce

Bangkok, Thailand

4.9765.8
7[7]Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University

Chiang Mai, Thailand

6.2474.9
---[---]Trade and Investment Division, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), United Nations

Bangkok, Thailand

7.5922
8[8]Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University

Bangkok, Thailand

8.9744

Top 25% authors in Thailand

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
RankW.RankAuthorScore
1[2]Piti Disyatat

Bank of Thailand, Bangkok

1.84
2[1]Edward Tower

Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok

2.57
3[3]Yunyong Thaicharoen

Bank of Thailand, Bangkok

3.64
4[4]Komain Jiranyakul

School of Development Economics, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok

4.4
5[6]Roy Kouwenberg

College of Management, Mahidol University, Bangkok

4.59
6[7]Alberto Ernesto Isgut

Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), United Nations, Bangkok

5.29
7[8]Frederic Tournemaine

Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok

7.34
8[9]Yann Duval

Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), United Nations, Bangkok

8.4
9[13]Weerachart Tee Kilenthong

School of Economics, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok

9.85
10[11]Pongsak Luangaram

Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok

9.93
11[15]Vatcharin Sirimaneetham

Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), United Nations, Bangkok

12.04
12[10]Songsak Sriboonchitta

Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai

12.46
13[12]Mia Mikic

Trade and Investment Division, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), United Nations, Bangkok

13.01
14[18]Vasileios Zikos

School of Economics, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok
Research Institute for Policy Evaluation and Design (RIPED), University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok

13.22
15[5]Nagesh Kumar

Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), United Nations, Bangkok

13.35
16[16]Chaiporn Vithessonthi

14.46
17[22]Kiatanantha Lounkaew

Faculty of Economics, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok

16.79
18[23]Pacharasut Sujarittanonta

Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok

17.59

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.