IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/top/old/1506/top.philippines.html
 

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Philippines, as of June 2015

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Philippines, there are 99 authors affiliated with 18 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to the weights they have set to each in their profile, or by default according to a formula described here.

All institutions in this region.

Top 25% institutions in Philippines

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[1]Asian Development Bank

Manila, Philippines

13328.86
2[2]School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman

Quezon City, Philippines

2.242623.95
3[4]Division of Social Science and Economics, Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)

Laguna/Los Banos, Philippines

2.9865
4[3]Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Government of the Philippines

Makati City, Philippines

4.36108.56

Top 25% authors in Philippines

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
RankW.RankAuthorScore
1[2]Guanghua Wan

Asian Development Bank, Manila

1.82
2[5]Rana Hasan

Asian Development Bank, Manila

3.3
3[3]Jesus Felipe

Asian Development Bank, Manila

3.69
4[6]Takashi Yamano

Division of Social Science and Economics, Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Laguna/Los Banos

3.82
5[4]Jayant Menon

Office of Regional Economic Integration, Asian Development Bank, Manila

6.44
6[10]Utsav Kumar

Economics and Research Department, Asian Development Bank, Manila

6.68
7[7]Arsenio Balisacan

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

8.71
8[11]Donghyun Park

Asian Development Bank, Manila

9.65
9[12]Flor Dy Mae G. Silva

Departamento ng Ekonomiks, Pamantasan ng De La Salle, Manila

10.46
10[16]Raul V. Fabella

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

10.76
11[1]James A. Roumasset

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

10.87
12[14]Ronald U. Mendoza

Policy Center, Asian Institute of Management, Makati City

11.68
13[18]Akiko Terada- Hagiwara

Asian Development Bank, Manila

11.94
14[8]Aniceto Cubil Orbeta Jr.

Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Government of the Philippines, Makati City

13.33
15[20]Cyn-Young Park

Asian Development Bank, Manila

14.01
16[9]Rafaelita Mercado Aldaba

Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Government of the Philippines, Makati City

14.12
17[24]Jose Encarnacion Jr.

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

14.58
18[13]Ernesto M. Pernia

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

15.97
19[22]Minsoo Lee

Asian Development Bank, Manila

17.06
20[28]Vicente Paqueo

Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Government of the Philippines, Makati City

17.89
21[25]Matty Demont

Division of Social Science and Economics, Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Laguna/Los Banos

19.27
22[17]Edsel L. Beja Jr.

Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University, Manila

20.71
23[30]Hongliang Yang

Asian Development Bank, Manila

22.26
24[23]Geoffrey M. Ducanes

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

22.27

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.