IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/pcon26/9.html

Case studies using Stata for applications in various disciplines: Labor market concentration and employee childbearing

Author

Listed:
  • Enzo A. Almeida

    (Nova SBE)

  • Luís Cabral

    (New York University, CEPR, and NPPI)

  • Pedro Martins

    (Nova SBE, IZA, GLO, and NPPI)

Abstract

We find that labor market concentration can be an important driver of employee childbearing. First, we present two parsimonious models to illustrate how childbearing decisions are related to employer concentration, highlighting job security and wages as relevant channels of labor market power. We then conduct empirical analyses based on comprehensive matched employer-employee panel data from Portugal from 2010 to 2023, including a novel variable on worker absences for childbearing reasons and an instrumental-variables approach. At both the extensive and intensive margins of childbearing, leave of absence is negatively impacted by concentration levels. For instance, an increase in labor concentration from the 25th to the 75th percentile can reduce childbearing by up to 94% for women up to 40 years of age. By extending the canonical child penalty model to consider labor market concentration, we also find that employees in more concentrated markets in their childbirth year are more penalized in terms of subsequent wages. Our results indicate that reducing employer concentration can increase fertility rates.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:boc:pcon26:9
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:pcon26:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.