IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma24/398729.html

Economic Consequences of Upgrading Animal Welfare Standards in the European Union on the Example of the Ban on the Use of Farrowing Crates in Pig Production

Author

Listed:
  • Malak-Rawlikowska, Agata
  • Majewski, Edward
  • Potori, Norbert
  • Hamulczuk, Mariusz
  • Szili, Viktor
  • Egri, Edit

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the economic effects of the proposed EU pig breeding ban on the usage of farrowing crates. Selected EU Member States' agricultural surveys and expert consultations served as the foundation for the impact evaluation. Four scenarios were used to further aggregate the data to determine the sectoral impact on the EU-27. Results indicate, that the EU's restriction on farrowing crates is predicted to have a negative impact on sow population and piglet output since it will increase the need for sow space, impair production efficiency, and require a substantial amount of investment. The switch to alternative farrowing systems will result in increased variable costs during the farrowing stage. The lower density, caused by the higher space allocation per sow in free farrowing systems (6.5m2 in free farrowing with temporary confinement and 7m2 in systems without confinement), will cause fixed expenses to rise proportionally to the drop in the sow herd. The installation of free farrowing and reconstruction of existing buildings. Depending on the scenario studied, investment costs range between EUR 3.5 and 6.2 billion, indicated in 2021 values.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma24:398729
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.398729
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/398729/files/Malak-Rawlikowska%20et%20al%20--%20Economic%20consequences%20of%20upgrading%20animal%20welfare%20standards%20in%20the%20EU.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.398729?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma24:398729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.