IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes025/356797.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Farmers' perceptions, drivers and impact of the adoption of Good Agricultural Practices on yield: Evidence from the cashew nut production in Côte d'Ivoire

Author

Listed:
  • Zié, Silué Nonlourou
  • Aboudou, Rachidi
  • Christophe, Adassé Chiapo
  • Assemien, Alexandre

Abstract

Côte d’Ivoire, the world's leading cashew nut producer with 1,200,000 tons in 2022, faces low productivity of raw cashew nuts (350–500 kg/ha) due to the limited adoption of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). This study explored the relationship between producers' perceptions and GAP adoption, identified factors influencing both the adoption and intensity of GAP use, and assessed the impact of GAP adoption on cashew nut yield. Using probit, Poisson regression, and marginal treatment effect models on data from 845 cashew producers, we found that plot preparation, direct seeding, shaping pruning, firebreak strips, thinning, and pruning were the most adopted GAP practices. The probit model results indicate that training, supervision by extension services, and producers' perceptions significantly determine GAP adoption. Additionally, gender, education level, social background, and access to extension services were key factors. Notably, the results from the marginal treatment effect models show that adopting thinning and pruning practices increased cashew nut yields by 194 kg/ha and 195 kg/ha, respectively. These findings emphasize the need for policies prioritizing training programs and strengthening extension services to boost GAP adoption and improve farmers’ yield. Scaling up these initiatives can contribute to sustainable yield improvements in Côte d’Ivoire and the wider West African region.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:aes025:356797
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.356797
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/356797/files/SILUE_NONLOUROU%20ZIE_Final%20paper%20Silue.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.356797?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes025:356797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.