IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes025/356634.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Adopting Ammonia Abatement: Thematic Insights into Farmers’ Perceptions and Policy 1 Challenges in Irish Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Daulagala, Chathurangá
  • Breen, James
  • Buckley, Cathal
  • Krol, Dominika J.

Abstract

Recently, several EU countries, including the Republic of Ireland, have struggled to meet legally binding commitments to reduce agricultural ammonia emissions. Some farmers readily embrace abatement measures, whereas others reject them. Research exploring technology rejection decisions is rare; however, understanding why some farmers reject recommended farming practices holds critical information for tailoring government support schemes and reducing pro-19 innovation biases. This study builds on Technology Acceptance Model, data collected from focus group discussions with dairy and beef cattle farmers across eight key farming regions and inductive thematic analysis. Three main themes, six subthemes and 26 codes were defined. Perceived costs of bovine farming methods include affordability, compatibility, usability, availability, and sufficient information which may lead farmers to reject adoption. Participants were frustrated with societal pressure for reducing emissions on farms and lack recognition for environmental services of grasslands, food production for humans and progress achieved towards environmental sustainability. Policy issues relating to slurry closing date and support schemes were identified. It is recommended to support small farms for adopting abatement technologies and to develop methods suitable to land and soil properties as well as local weather.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:aes025:356634
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.356634
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/356634/files/Chathuranga_Daulagala_Themes_AES_2025.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.356634?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes025:356634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.