Author
Listed:
- Spada, Riccardo
- Moritz, Laura
- Rommel, Jens
- Cerroni, Simone
- Meuwissen, Miranda P.M.
- Dalhaus, Tobias
Abstract
Price volatility is a significant risk in agriculture, and risk-averse farmers might sacrifice part of their expected profits to mitigate it. Risk management tools such as forward contracts, futures, options, and price insurance, are designed to hedge price risk. Yet adoption rates are low, which contradicts standard expected utility maximizing behavior. We therefore systematically review the literature on the relationship between behavioral factors and farmers’ adoption of price risk management tools to better understand the adoption decision. We here categorize behavioral factors into behavioral preferences, formally integrated into economic choice models, and into psychological factors, which lack mathematical formalization. We use these conceptual model to define search terms and then follow the PRISMA approach to identify 100 relevant papers. Results show that the vast majority of studies incorporate risk aversion in an Expected Utility framework to conceptualize price risk management decisions. Therefore, we conclude that behavioral economic models such as Cumulative Prospect Theory, that incorporates behavioral preferences such as loss aversion and probability distortion, offer promising pathways to better explain farmers’ price risk management decisions. Regarding psychological factors, findings highlight the role of risk attitudes, social environment, and cognitive perceptions in shaping farmers’ decisions. Further research is required to identify behavioral economic preferences that explain price risk management decisions. Moreover, price risk management tools should be adjusted to better consider farmer preferences and thereby become more attractive to farmers.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:ags:aes025:356632
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.356632
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes025:356632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.