IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssdmcp/978-90-481-8939-7_7.html

Religion, Religiosity and Male and Female Fertility

Author

Listed:
  • Li Zhang

    (Virginia Commonwealth University, L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs)

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated religion to be an important factor that differentiates women’s fertility. This chapter extends the examination to men’s fertility outcome and their religion. Besides examining religious affiliation and fertility, I also take religiosity into consideration, which is measured by the manner in which people practice their religion. I begin the chapter by reviewing four principle hypotheses proposed in the literature that explain fertility differentials among people with different religious affiliations. The chapter then sets forth a series of hypotheses on religious affiliation, religiosity and male and female fertility. These hypotheses are tested by analyzing male and female samples taken from the NSFG Cycle 6 data set. The results show that the fertility gap among religious groups is shrinking for both men and women, meaning religious denomination may not be an important indicator that differentiates fertility in future. However, religiosity turns to be a factor that demonstrates substantial importance when shaping religious people’s fertility outcomes. Through contrasting the effects of religion and religiosity on male and female fertility, the results of this research show that religion and religiosity do not seem to be factors that differentiate women’s than on men’s fertility.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-90-481-8939-7_7
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8939-7_7
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-90-481-8939-7_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.