IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssdmcp/978-3-031-28697-1_7.html

Exploring Cross-National Comparability of Unidimensional Constructs

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasia Charalampi

    (Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Department of Social Policy)

  • Catherine Michalopoulou

    (Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Department of Social Policy)

  • Clive Richardson

    (Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Department of Economic and Regional Development)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose an empirical methodology for exploring the standardization of unidimensional constructs and providing cross-national comparative analyses. For the demonstration of the suggested methodology, and in order to facilitate practical applications, we used an 8-item scale measuring functioning as a determinant of wellbeing which was included in the 2012 European Social Survey questionnaire for 17 European countries. Initially, the inclusion of items for further analysis was investigated at country level in order to create an overall measure. This led to the creation of a common 7-item unidimensional construct for 14 countries. The common structures were validated and, based on the results of Confirmatory factor analyses, their psychometric properties were assessed, providing reliable and valid constructs for each case. In addition, a cross-national comparison of mean scores of the resulting overall measure of functioning was conducted in relation to measures of satisfaction with life and happiness. Similar patterns were observed cross-nationally, as higher levels of the overall measure of functioning were obtained for those inclined to the higher end of the scales of satisfaction with life and happiness.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-3-031-28697-1_7
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-28697-1_7
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-3-031-28697-1_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.