IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fuobcp/978-3-032-11748-9_1.html

The Automation Fallacy: Why AI Doesn’t Function as a Simple “Job Killer”

In: The AI Competency Paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Prashant Singh Yadav

Abstract

The notion that artificial intelligence (AI) will inevitably lead to mass job displacement is a widely accepted yet fundamentally flawed perspective. This chapter challenges what we term the Automation Fallacy—the oversimplified belief that AI functions primarily as a job killer that will systematically eliminate human work from the bottom up. By examining empirical evidence and contemporary case studies, we demonstrate that AI’s true impact is more nuanced, involving the transformation of work rather than straightforward elimination of jobs. The chapter introduces the AI-Competency Paradox, which reveals how AI disrupts competencies before it disrupts jobs, with the greatest impact on structured, rule-based knowledge work rather than following the presumed bottom-up pattern of displacement. Drawing from case studies including Tesla’s manufacturing automation missteps and Toyota’s successful human-AI integration, we establish that organizations viewing AI as a simple workforce replacement tool consistently underperform those that strategically realign human capabilities. This challenges businesses to reconsider their approach to AI adoption, workforce development, and competitive strategy.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-032-11748-9_1
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-11748-9_1
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-032-11748-9_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.