IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fuobcp/978-3-032-07605-2_9.html

Ethical Limits of AI Use in the Media Sector

In: Handbook of AI-based Media Disruption

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Schützeneder

    (University of the Bundeswehr Munich)

Abstract

The present and future of the media industry are intensively influenced by groundbreaking developments in the field of automation and artificial intelligence (AI). The debates from science and practice largely trade off the opportunities and risks against each other. Regardless of this, one thing is certain: the AI innovation cycle has only just begun. As a “mediating authority,” media ethics organizes and structures the various ideas, balances between philosophy and the reality of life in general and thus provides orientation, boundaries, and recommendations. This chapter takes up the idea of ethics as a “mediating authority” and asks specifically about the ethical limits of AI use in the media sector. What does the current state of research and practice say about the ethical limits of AI use in the media industry? And: Where is there (nevertheless) a need for action, and how can the future of media products and productions be shaped in the medium term on the basis of ethical dimensions? Based on studies and documents from media policy, media-related institutions, and media companies, a broader picture of current efforts and media ethical boundaries emerges. Three central dimensions of ethical boundaries become particularly clear in the media companies: human and machine control, safeguarding quality standards, and free opinion-forming as well as limits in the function and use of “social scoring.” These are not the only examples: AI provides completely changed possibilities for obtaining and disseminating information. This gives rise to new tasks and questions for media ethics in an AI-influenced media world.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-032-07605-2_9
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-07605-2_9
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-032-07605-2_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.