IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fuobcp/978-3-032-06604-6_10.html

Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Creativity from an Idea Management Perspective

In: Artificial Humans

Author

Listed:
  • Elina Mikelsone

    (Riga Technical University)

  • Matijs Babris

    (Riga Technical University)

  • Andra Marta Babre

    (Riga Technical University)

  • Anna Salnikova

    (Riga Stradins University, Kurzemes Rajons)

Abstract

A within-subjects study compared the idea generation performance of human teams and AI under different configurations, using both quantitative and qualitative analyses to assess their outputs. AI consistently outperformed human teams in generating a greater number of ideas. Notably, a neutral AI—unbiased and drawing from extensive datasets—produced the highest volume of ideas, confirming its strength in generating diverse solutions rapidly. Human-generated ideas scored higher in feasibility and contextual depth, reflecting a refined understanding of real-world constraints. This chapter contributes to the field by exploring the potential of web-based idea management through an experiment comparing human and AI-generated ideas. Evaluating the strengths and limitations of each offers insights to help better navigate the integration of AI in future idea management practices.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-032-06604-6_10
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-06604-6_10
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-032-06604-6_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.