IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fuobcp/978-3-031-79070-6_9.html

Choosing a Tangible Strategic Focus Rather Than Building Upon an Abstract Vision

In: Design Thinking for Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Claude Diderich

    (innovate.d llc)

Abstract

Strategy development and review initiatives face the crucial challenge of where to start. The starting point is not just a matter of preference but a critical decision that sets the course for the entire strategy. Traditional strategy research suggests starting by formulating a vision and a mission, describing the core ideology and envisioned future. Others recommend taking a resource-based approach, focusing on capabilities as the foundation for competitive advantage. More recently, authors, such as Christensen, argue that the design of any strategy should start with questions related to customer needs and their jobs. I introduce the novel concept of strategic focus as the primary dimension along which to compete and differentiate. Any strategy development should start by identifying whether to compete and excel by being customer-centric, focusing on product and service innovation, leveraging core capabilities, or differentiating around financials. The target strategic focus is determined based on the chosen target industry, the environment analysis outcome, and the expected desirability and uniqueness.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-031-79070-6_9
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-79070-6_9
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-031-79070-6_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.