Author
Listed:
- Julia Plugmann
(Medical Practice for General Medicine)
- Philipp Plugmann
(Heidelberg, Campus Cologne, SRH University of Applied Sciences)
Abstract
The research question of the previous study (Study No. 1) was motivated by open innovation platforms in other industries—such as the previously well-known American company LOCAL MOTORS from the automotive industry—where technological products were built with an effective marketing approach that appealed to creative and innovative individuals. While in “Study No. 1” we focused on the “willingness of academics to participate and collaborate in an open innovation platform to develop new innovative medical technology products with individuals, groups, communities and companies,” this follow-up study (Study No. 2) focuses on the “willingness of academics to participate in an open innovation platform in healthcare outside their qualifications and work experience,” which also leads to the need for these academics to build self-taught competence. This should activate creativity among the participating academics and promote new individual and group-based approaches to innovation management. In Study No. 2, we only surveyed those who had responded in Study No. 1 the willingness to co-develop medical technology products within an open innovation platform. Academic discipline (six categories) was the most important predictor of whether participation in an open innovation platform was likely outside of one’s own qualifications and professional experience. Academics from medicine and biology, as well as physics and chemistry, were significantly more willing to participate compared to philosophers. Language barriers, duration of the projects, acceptance of a project manager or motivating factors, such as money or fun, did not say anything about the prediction of possible participation. Overall, the development of an open innovation platform as a sustainable future concept for innovations in the healthcare sector offers an opportunity and should be promoted in order to offer academics interested in innovation another option for participating in innovation processes.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-031-78322-7_11
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-78322-7_11
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-031-78322-7_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.