IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fuobcp/978-3-031-61774-4_20.html

Is Your Presentation Sexy Enough?

In: Pre-Project Excellence

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael H Cohen

Abstract

ISO 56007 suggests the two-document approach as a valid alternative to the traditional business plan for presenting concepts to decision-makers innovators. The two-document approach corresponds to the approach that the IpOp Model has been advocating since 2006: one concept/Opportunity Case that gives decision-makers all the essential information they need to allocate Resources to projects except the Implementation plan that is presented in a separate document, only when Decision-makers are convinced by the merits of the project. As an example of concept case, ISO 56007 presents in its annex almost the same IpOp Model template that is described in this chapter. By mastering the IpOp Model and its key parameters, robust concept/Opportunity Cases can be developed according to ISO 56007 recommendations. By leveraging the Decision-makers drivers and psychology, the IpOp Model template uses a storyline designed to build trust, mindshare, and buy-in. This chapter provides insights into how the IpOp Model can help to provide relevant information for each component of the concept/Opportunity Case. This chapter also provides a table illustrating how the IpOp Model can be used to develop a business plan.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-031-61774-4_20
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-61774-4_20
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-031-61774-4_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.