IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fuobcp/978-3-030-22228-4_2.html

Strategic Momentum

In: Effective Virtual Project Teams

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond Opdenakker

    (Bureau Lara)

  • Carin Cuypers

    (Bureau Lara)

Abstract

In step 2 of the Design Science Research Cycle, a systematic literature review is conducted to see if grounded and field-tested design propositions can be found. These can be used to design the solution concept for the field problem at stake. But until now, no one has addressed the specific field problem concerning virtual project teams. Therefore, there is no grounding for the design propositions, and even a ‘design idea’ is absent, so abduction can be introduced in step 3. In this chapter, as part of the third step of the Design Science Research Cycle, we will first consider the concept of strategic momentum. We will describe the history of the concept of momentum, which has its roots in physics. Then, we will present the outcome of a literature review concerning strategic momentum in the academic management field. Finally, after the concept of momentum in virtual project teams has been defined, we will discuss a way in which strategic momentum can be measured in virtual project teams. After this discussion concerning strategic momentum, we will present the causal model, which is the solution concept or artefact with which the field problem can be addressed. In this model, the variables influencing the emergence and sustaining of strategic momentum are presented. The model hypothesises that these are team task insight, empowerment, and collective commitment. Concerning the fourth step of the Design Science Research Cycle ‘formulating initial propositions’, four initial propositions are presented.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-030-22228-4_2
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22228-4_2
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-030-22228-4_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.