IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/ismrjl/324685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Absolventen 2015 unter die Lupe genommen: Ziele, Wertvorstellungen und Karriereorientierung der Generation Y

Author

Listed:
  • Böckenholt, Ingo
  • Frohne, Julia
  • Eikenbusch, Julia
  • Belch, Theresa

Abstract

The present study examines working and recreation values, career motives as well as expecta-tions of tasks and prospective employers of university graduates 2015 which are part of the Generation Y. As a main result, the reconciliation of friends, family and work is gaining great importance, whereby only 20 percent of the graduates are characterized by a classical career orientation. On the basis of the surveyed data four types of graduates could be clearly positioned: The ambi-tious (38 %), the experience-oriented (29 %), the career-oriented (20 %) and the orientation-seekers (13 %). These four types distinguish from each other with respect to their objectives and expectations of the perfect employer. For the ambitious (38 %) and the career-oriented (20 %) success and career are of particular relevance. Both types are characterized by a distinctive achievement motivation and are suitable for leading positions. Indeed, the experience-oriented (29 %) and the orientation-seekers (13 %) do not strive for leading positions and set a high value on family and friends. Furthermore, this study reveals substantial gender effects for the career-oriented and experi-ence-oriented. While the majority of the experience-oriented was female, the majority of the career-oriented was male. Analogous to the ambitious, the orientation-seekers exhibit a nearly equal gender distribution, whereby women tend to be more uncertain about their future plan-ning. Deriving from this survey, implications for recruiting, organizational culture leadership and compensation can be made. These results help companies to understand the attitude of the new employees which are currently entering the labor market.

Suggested Citation

  • Böckenholt, Ingo & Frohne, Julia & Eikenbusch, Julia & Belch, Theresa, 2015. "Absolventen 2015 unter die Lupe genommen: Ziele, Wertvorstellungen und Karriereorientierung der Generation Y," ISM Research Journal, International School of Management (ISM), Dortmund, vol. 2(1), pages 57-79.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ismrjl:324685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/324685/1/RJ-2-2015-057.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Schuh & Alina Hernandez Bark & Niels Van Quaquebeke & Rüdiger Hossiep & Philip Frieg & Rolf Dick, 2014. "Gender Differences in Leadership Role Occupancy: The Mediating Role of Power Motivation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 363-379, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanna Campopiano & Patricia Gabaldón & Daniela Gimenez-Jimenez, 2023. "Women Directors and Corporate Social Performance: An Integrative Review of the Literature and a Future Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 717-746, January.
    2. Salvador Carmona & Mahmoud Ezzamel & Claudia Mogotocoro, 2018. "Gender, Management Styles, and Forms of Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 357-373, December.
    3. Leon Windscheid & Lynn Bowes-Sperry & Karsten Jonsen & Michèle Morner, 2018. "Managing Organizational Gender Diversity Images: A Content Analysis of German Corporate Websites," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 997-1013, November.
    4. Hendrik Slabbinck & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Julie Hermans & Johanna Vanderstraeten & Marcus Dejardin & Jacqueline Brassey & Dendi Ramdani, 2018. "The added value of implicit motives for management research Development and first validation of a Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) for the measurement of implicit motives," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Baldacchino Peter.J & Mercieca & Marelaine & Tabone & Norbert & Ellul & Lauren Grima & Simon, 2022. "Board Gender Diversity in Maltese Equity-Listed and Large Public Sector Entities*," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 555-586.
    6. Hannah Kremer & Isabel Villamor & Margaret Ormiston, 2024. "The Ripple Effect: When Leader Self-Group Distancing Responses Affect Subordinate Career Trajectories," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(4), pages 813-829, December.
    7. Christian Mai & Marion Büttgen & Dominik Schwarzinger, 2017. "„Think-Manager-Consider-Female“: Eine Analyse stereotypischer Ansichten über weibliche Führungskräfte und die empirische Überprüfung ihrer realen Persönlichkeit anhand der Big Five und Dunklen Triade<," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 119-152, June.
    8. Julie Hermans & Hendrik Slabbinck & Johanna Vanderstraeten & Jacqueline Brassey & Marcus Dejardin & Dendi Ramdani & Arjen Van Witteloostuijn, 2017. "The Power Paradox: Implicit and Explicit Power Motives, and the Importance Attached to Prosocial Organizational Goals in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, November.
    9. Oren Griffiths & Lynette Roberts & Josh Price, 2019. "Desirable leadership attributes are preferentially associated with women: A quantitative study of gender and leadership roles in the Australian workforce," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(1), pages 32-49, February.
    10. repec:plo:pone00:0125721 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Lucas Monzani & Alina Hernandez Bark & Rolf van Dick & José Peiró, 2015. "The Synergistic Effect of Prototypicality and Authenticity in the Relation Between Leaders’ Biological Gender and Their Organizational Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 737-752, December.
    12. Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Marcus Dejardin & Julie Hermans & Dendi Ramdani, & Johanna Vanderstraeten & Jacqueline Brassey & Hendrik Slabbinck, 2015. "Fitting entrepreneurial, firm-level and environmental contingencies for better performance," Post-Print halshs-01379907, HAL.
    13. Maja Rožman & Simona Sternad Zabukovšek & Samo Bobek & Polona Tominc, 2021. "Gender Differences in Work Satisfaction, Work Engagement and Work Efficiency of Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case in Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Alina S. Hernandez Bark & Jordi Escartín & Sebastian C. Schuh & Rolf Dick, 2016. "Who Leads More and Why? A Mediation Model from Gender to Leadership Role Occupancy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 473-483, December.
    15. Merita Begolli Dauti & Rron Dauti, 2020. "The Glass Ceiling: Existence Barriers Affecting Women’s Career Development," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 111-121.
    16. Kate Whitman & Zahra Murad & Joe Cox, 2024. "Psychological Reactance to Anti-Piracy Messages explained by Gender and Attitudes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 61-75, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ismrjl:324685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ismdode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.