IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsz/fiq000/v14y2018i1id623.html

Terminal Value Calculation In Dcf Valuation Models: An Empirical Verification

Author

Listed:
  • ADAM BEHR
  • PAWEŁ MIELCARZ

    (Koźmiński University)

  • DMYTRO OSIICHUK

    (Koźmiński University)

Abstract

The paper presents an empirical verification of the main assumptions underlying the calculation of terminal value in DCF valuation models. The test results suggest that the volatility of free cash flows and the dynamism of the operating environment do not allow usto make a reliable long-term forecast of value creation potential of the public companies in Poland. Regardless of their organic growth phase, the overwhelming majority of the sampled firms are evidenced to exhibit extreme year-on-year fluctuations of sales, investments and cash flows over the short- and medium-term observation windows. The variability of operating results and the probabilistic nature of company- -level fundamentals may preclude the possibility of constructing a reliable cash flow forecast for the purposes of a DCF valuation. This methodological issue appears to pose a particular challenge during the calculation of terminal value, which is heavily dependent on highly subjective and uncertain steady-state fundamentals. Therefore, the predictive power of the deterministic DCF models may be reduced to a snapshot of the current market sentiment regarding a particular stock. The paper postulates that a further discussion on the tenets of terminal value calculation may be necessary in order to overcome the existing flaws and increase the accuracy of valuation models. We contribute to this discussion by outlining the principal methodological and theoretical issues which challenge the practicing valuators at the stage of terminal value calculation. Our conclusions may help to shed light on the problems of market short-termism, and high inconstancy of investment recommendations.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:wsz:fiq000:v:14:y:2018:i:1:id:623
DOI: 10.2478/fiqf-2018-0003
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://journals.wsiz.edu.pl/fiq/article/view/623
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://journals.wsiz.edu.pl/fiq/article/download/623/585
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/fiqf-2018-0003?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsz:fiq000:v:14:y:2018:i:1:id:623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiesław Stręciwilk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.wsiz.edu.pl/fiq .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.