IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n7706992.html

Model Averaging Estimation Method by Kullback–Leibler Divergence for Multiplicative Error Model

Author

Listed:
  • Wanbo Lu
  • Wenhui Shi

Abstract

In this paper, we propose the model averaging estimation method for multiplicative error model and construct the corresponding weight choosing criterion based on the Kullback–Leibler divergence with a hyperparameter to avoid the problem of overfitting. The resulting model average estimator is proved to be asymptotically optimal. It is shown that the Kullback–Leibler model averaging (KLMA) estimator asymptotically minimizes the in‐sample Kullback–Leibler divergence and improves the forecast accuracy of out‐of‐sample even under different loss functions. In simulations, we show that the KLMA estimator compares favorably with smooth‐AIC estimator (SAIC), smooth‐BIC estimator (SBIC), and Mallows model averaging estimator (MMA), especially when some nonlinear noise is added to the data generation process. The empirical applications in the daily range of S&P500 and price duration of IBM show that the out‐of‐sample forecasting capacity of the KLMA estimator is better than that of other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanbo Lu & Wenhui Shi, 2022. "Model Averaging Estimation Method by Kullback–Leibler Divergence for Multiplicative Error Model," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:7706992
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/7706992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7706992
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/7706992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asger Lunde & Peter R. Hansen, 2005. "A forecast comparison of volatility models: does anything beat a GARCH(1,1)?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(7), pages 873-889.
    2. Tsai, Henghsiu & Chan, Kung-Sik, 2008. "A Note On Inequality Constraints In The Garch Model," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 823-828, June.
    3. L. Bauwens & J. V. K. Rombouts, 2007. "Bayesian Clustering of Many Garch Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2-4), pages 365-386.
    4. Aman Ullah & Huansha Wang, 2013. "Parametric and Nonparametric Frequentist Model Selection and Model Averaging," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Shangwei Zhao & Yanyuan Ma & Alan T. K. Wan & Xinyu Zhang & Shouyang Wang, 2020. "Model averaging in a multiplicative heteroscedastic model," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 1100-1124, November.
    6. Luc Bauwens & Pierre Giot, 2000. "The Logarithmic ACD Model: An Application to the Bid-Ask Quote Process of Three NYSE Stocks," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 60, pages 117-149.
    7. repec:adr:anecst:y:2000:i:60:p:05 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    9. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    10. Robert F. Engle & Jeffrey R. Russell, 1998. "Autoregressive Conditional Duration: A New Model for Irregularly Spaced Transaction Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(5), pages 1127-1162, September.
    11. Nelson, Daniel B & Cao, Charles Q, 1992. "Inequality Constraints in the Univariate GARCH Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 10(2), pages 229-235, April.
    12. Qingfeng Liu & Qingsong Yao & Guoqing Zhao, 2020. "Model averaging estimation for conditional volatility models with an application to stock market volatility forecast," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(5), pages 841-863, August.
    13. Wanbo Lu & Rui Ke, 2019. "A generalized least squares estimation method for the autoregressive conditional duration model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 123-146, February.
    14. Chou, Ray Yeutien, 2005. "Forecasting Financial Volatilities with Extreme Values: The Conditional Autoregressive Range (CARR) Model," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(3), pages 561-582, June.
    15. N. Taylor & Y. Xu, 2017. "The logarithmic vector multiplicative error model: an application to high frequency NYSE stock data," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 1021-1035, July.
    16. Bruce E. Hansen, 2007. "Least Squares Model Averaging," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 1175-1189, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Bollerslev, 2008. "Glossary to ARCH (GARCH)," CREATES Research Papers 2008-49, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    2. Fałdziński, Marcin & Fiszeder, Piotr & Molnár, Peter, 2024. "Improving volatility forecasts: Evidence from range-based models," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    3. Christian T. Brownlees & Fabrizio Cipollini & Giampiero M. Gallo, 2011. "Multiplicative Error Models," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2011_03, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti", revised Apr 2011.
    4. Isuru Ratnayake & V. A. Samaranayake, 2022. "Threshold Asymmetric Conditional Autoregressive Range (TACARR) Model," Papers 2202.03351, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    5. Mapa, Dennis S., 2003. "A Range-Based GARCH Model for Forecasting Volatility," MPRA Paper 21323, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Luc Bauwens & Sébastien Laurent & Jeroen V. K. Rombouts, 2006. "Multivariate GARCH models: a survey," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(1), pages 79-109, January.
    7. Fabrizio Cipollini & Robert F. Engle & Giampiero M. Gallo, 2006. "Vector Multiplicative Error Models: Representation and Inference," NBER Technical Working Papers 0331, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. repec:bla:jecsur:v:22:y:2008:i:4:p:711-751 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Xiufeng Yan, 2021. "Autoregressive conditional duration modelling of high frequency data," Papers 2111.02300, arXiv.org.
    10. Carl Lönnbark, 2016. "Asymmetry with respect to the memory in stock market volatilities," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1409-1419, June.
    11. Sucarrat, Genaro, 2018. "The Log-GARCH Model via ARMA Representations," MPRA Paper 100386, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Markku Lanne, 2006. "A Mixture Multiplicative Error Model for Realized Volatility," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 594-616.
    13. Lin, Edward M.H. & Chen, Cathy W.S. & Gerlach, Richard, 2012. "Forecasting volatility with asymmetric smooth transition dynamic range models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 384-399.
    14. Conrad, Christian, 2010. "Non-negativity conditions for the hyperbolic GARCH model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 441-457, August.
    15. Cipollini, Fabrizio & Gallo, Giampiero M. & Otranto, Edoardo, 2021. "Realized volatility forecasting: Robustness to measurement errors," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 44-57.
    16. Chiranjit Dutta & Kara Karpman & Sumanta Basu & Nalini Ravishanker, 2023. "Review of Statistical Approaches for Modeling High-Frequency Trading Data," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(1), pages 1-48, May.
    17. Chen, Cathy W.S. & Gerlach, Richard & Lin, Edward M.H., 2008. "Volatility forecasting using threshold heteroskedastic models of the intra-day range," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 2990-3010, February.
    18. Mauro Bernardi & Leopoldo Catania, 2016. "Comparison of Value-at-Risk models using the MCS approach," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 579-608, June.
    19. Fiszeder, Piotr & Fałdziński, Marcin & Molnár, Peter, 2019. "Range-based DCC models for covariance and value-at-risk forecasting," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 58-76.
    20. Hossain, Md. Jamal & Akter, Sadia & Ismail, Mohd Tahir, 2021. "Performance Analysis of GARCH Family Models in Three Time-frames," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 55(2), pages 15-28.
    21. Karanasos, Menelaos & Xu, Yongdeng & Yfanti, Stavroula, 2017. "Constrained QML Estimation for Multivariate Asymmetric MEM with Spillovers: The Practicality of Matrix Inequalities," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2017/14, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:7706992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.