IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n5920189.html

Applications of Cubic Schweizer–Sklar Power Heronian Mean to Multiple Attribute Decision‐Making

Author

Listed:
  • Qaisar Khan
  • Muhammad Shahzad
  • Saqib Sharif
  • Mohammed Elgarhy
  • Mahmoud El-Morshedy
  • Suleman Nasiru

Abstract

The cubic set (CS) is a basic simplification of several fuzzy notions, including fuzzy set (FS), interval‐valued FS (IVFS), and intuitionistic FS (IFS). By the degrees of IVFS and FS, CS exposes fuzzy judgement, and this is a much more potent mathematical approach for dealing with information that is unclear, ambiguous, or indistinguishable. The article provides many innovative operational laws for cubic numbers (CNs) drawn on the Schweizer–Sklar (SS) t‐norm (SSTN), and the SS t‐conorm (SSTCN), as well as several desired properties of these operational laws. We also plan to emphasise on the cubic Schweizer–Sklar power Heronian mean (CSSPHM) operator, as well as the cubic Schweizer–Sklar power geometric Heronian mean (CSSPGHM) operator, in order to maintain the supremacy of the power aggregation (PA) operators that seize the complications of the unsuitable information and Heronian mean (HM) operators that contemplate the interrelationship between the input data being aggregated. A novel multiple attribute decision‐making (MADM) model is anticipated for these freshly launched aggregation operators (AOs). Finally, a numerical example of enterprise resource planning is used to validate the approach’s relevance and usefulness. There is also a comparison with existing decision‐making models.

Suggested Citation

  • Qaisar Khan & Muhammad Shahzad & Saqib Sharif & Mohammed Elgarhy & Mahmoud El-Morshedy & Suleman Nasiru, 2022. "Applications of Cubic Schweizer–Sklar Power Heronian Mean to Multiple Attribute Decision‐Making," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:5920189
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/5920189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5920189
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/5920189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nagarajan, D. & Lathamaheswari, M. & Broumi, Said & Kavikumar, J., 2019. "A new perspective on traffic control management using triangular interval type-2 fuzzy sets and interval neutrosophic sets," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    2. Qaisar Khan & Jeonghwan Gwak & Muhammad Shahzad & Muhammad Kamran Alam, 2021. "A Novel Approached Based on T-Spherical Fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar Power Heronian Mean Operator for Evaluating Water Reuse Applications under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-35, June.
    3. Patchara Phochanikorn & Chunqiao Tan, 2019. "A New Extension to a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection under an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Ming-Lang Tseng & Phan Anh Tan & Shiou-Yun Jeng & Chun-Wei Remen Lin & Yeneneh Tamirat Negash & Susilo Nur Aji Cokro Darsono, 2019. "Sustainable Investment: Interrelated among Corporate Governance, Economic Performance and Market Risks Using Investor Preference Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Peide Liu & Peng Wang, 2018. "Some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar power aggregation operators and their application to supplier selection," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 1188-1211, April.
    6. Peide Liu & Lili Zhang & Xi Liu & Peng Wang, 2016. "Multi-Valued Neutrosophic Number Bonferroni Mean Operators with their Applications in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(05), pages 1181-1210, September.
    7. Aliya Fahmi & Fazli Amin & Saleem Abdullah & Asad Ali, 2018. "Cubic fuzzy Einstein aggregation operators and its application to decision-making," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(11), pages 2385-2397, August.
    8. Stekelorum, Rebecca & Laguir, Issam & Gupta, Shivam & Kumar, Sameer, 2021. "Green supply chain management practices and third-party logistics providers’ performances: A fuzzy-set approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qaisar Khan & Jeonghwan Gwak & Muhammad Shahzad & Muhammad Kamran Alam, 2021. "A Novel Approached Based on T-Spherical Fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar Power Heronian Mean Operator for Evaluating Water Reuse Applications under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-35, June.
    2. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Wenyu Chen & Weimin Li & Lei Shao & Tao Zhang & Xi Wang, 2023. "Large-scale group-hierarchical DEMATEL method for complex systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Inese Mavlutova & Andris Fomins & Aivars Spilbergs & Dzintra Atstaja & Janis Brizga, 2021. "Opportunities to Increase Financial Well-Being by Investing in Environmental, Social and Governance with Respect to Improving Financial Literacy under COVID-19: The Case of Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Xiao-Guang Yue & Yan Han & Deimante Teresiene & Justina Merkyte & Wei Liu, 2020. "Sustainable Funds’ Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Deveci, Muhammet & Pamucar, Dragan & Gokasar, Ilgin & Isik, Mehtap & Coffman, D'Maris, 2022. "Fuzzy Einstein WASPAS approach for the economic and societal dynamics of the climate change mitigation strategies in urban mobility planning," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-17.
    7. Pratibha Rani & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro & Dalia Štreimikienė & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, 2020. "Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR Framework for Performance Evaluation of Solar Panel Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Ernest Mugoni & Basil Shumbanhete & Brighton Nyagadza, 2025. "The Nexus Between Circular Economy (CE) and Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM): A Systematic Literature Review and Mapping of Future Research Agenda," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(6), pages 5027-5064, November.
    9. Koray Altintas & Ozalp Vayvay & Sinan Apak & Emine Cobanoglu, 2020. "An Extended GRA Method Integrated with Fuzzy AHP to Construct a Multidimensional Index for Ranking Overall Energy Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Gönül Çifçi & Adem Ruhan Sönmez, 2023. "Is sustainability important for returns?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 15119-15137, December.
    11. Fatih Ecer, 2022. "Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 199-233, March.
    12. Sophia Xiaoxia Duan & Santoso Wibowo & Josephine Chong, 2021. "A Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Evaluating the Performance of Agriculture Decision Support Systems for Sustainable Agribusiness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Huijie Li & Jie Li, 2021. "Risk Governance and Sustainability: A Scientometric Analysis and Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Pal Singh, Satender & Adhikari, Arnab & Majumdar, Adrija & Bisi, Arnab, 2022. "Does service quality influence operational and financial performance of third party logistics service providers? A mixed multi criteria decision making -text mining-based investigation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Ananna Paul & Nagesh Shukla & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Andrea Trianni, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, June.
    16. Yuan Li & Yongchun Huang & Yupeng Zhao & Zi Ye, 2025. "The Impact of Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Total Factor Productivity: An Analysis of the Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Songtao Shao & Xiaohong Zhang, 2019. "Measures of Probabilistic Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and the Application in Reducing Unnecessary Evaluation Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Navid Zarbakhshnia & Kannan Govindan & Devika Kannan & Mark Goh, 2023. "Outsourcing logistics operations in circular economy towards to sustainable development goals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 134-162, January.
    19. Esfahbodi, Ali & Zhang, Yufeng & Liu, Yang & Geng, Duanyang, 2023. "The fallacy of profitable green supply chains: The role of green information systems (GIS) in attenuating the sustainability trade-offs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    20. Kumar, Satish & Sahoo, Saumyaranjan & Lim, Weng Marc & Kraus, Sascha & Bamel, Umesh, 2022. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:5920189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.