Author
Listed:
- Muhammad Amjad
(University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan)
- Ubaid-Ur-Rehman Zia
(University of Cambridge, United Kingdom)
Abstract
Gastrointestinal infection due to Campylobacter has been increasing throughout the world especially in developing countries where hygienic measures are compromising. In this review we have focused on the poultry role as source and reservoir for campylobacter infection compared with other meat sources. Contamination of Campylobacter starts from the surroundings of poultry flocks leading to its colonization subsequently transfer from poultry food chain to consumers through handling of raw or improperly cooked meat. Prevalence of Campylobacter is high in those regions where poultry production or consumption is high i.e., in European countries. Campylobacter infection has spread along with development of the poultry industry in the world as poultry is the main source of spread for Campylobacter species. Traveling to those areas where Campylobacter is prevalent is major risk factor for its spread. Increase in antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter due to over use of medicines both in meat producing animals and humans is a disturbing situation for Public Health. Aim of intervention studies is to control colonization of Campylobacter at farm level that has proved to be promising outcomes in many countries. Proper biosecurity of farm and awareness programs for workers and consumers is necessary for control of infection. Proper batching, slaughtering, evisceration, packing, handling and cooking are also contributing factors to control of infection. Decreasing the over or unnecessary use of medicine is vital to avoid antimicrobial resistance in all types of bacteria. Although poultry is a major source along with some other meat for campylobacteriosis in humans but our surroundings i.e., untreated drinking water, sea food, direct contact with pets or commercial animals and some other sources that need to be studied are contributing to Campylobacter infection.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:vetmed:v:3:y:2023:i:1:id:3087
DOI: 10.24018/ejvetmed.2023.3.1.87
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:vetmed:v:3:y:2023:i:1:id:3087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/vetmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.