Author
Listed:
- Bibek Chandra Sutradhar
(Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh)
- Sreekanta Biswas
(Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh)
- Sabiha Zarin Tasnim Bristi
(Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh)
- Tuli Dey
(Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh)
- Thomby Paul
(Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh)
- Debashish Sarker
(Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh)
- Muhammad Farhad Hossain
(Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Bangladesh)
Abstract
Umbilical hernia is the most common birth defect in calves, especially in the male. The aim of this study was to justify the semi-open herniorrhaphy compared with other techniques for the treatment of umbilical hernia in male calves. This research included 54 clinical cases of reducible umbilical hernia (11 indigenous, 43 crossbred calves). The ages of 54 calves ranged from less than 1 month to 6 months. Sizes of the hernial ring ranged from 2-6 cm. Out of the 54 hernias, 20 were treated with open herniorrhaphy, 16 with closed herniorrhaphy, and 18 with semi-open herniorrhaphy. Among the three correction methods of umbilical hernia in calves, the semi-open herniorrhaphy was the best with a 96.65% recovery rate without any complication, followed by the closed method (93.3%) and open method (66.67%) of herniorrhaphy. The average recovery period was also the best in semi-open herniorrhaphy (10.27 days), followed by the open method (12.44 days) and the close method (21.01 days). These findings suggest that semi-open herniorrhaphy is the best method to correct umbilical hernia in calves, especially in the male.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:vetmed:v:3:y:2023:i:1:id:3045
DOI: 10.24018/ejvetmed.2023.3.1.45
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:vetmed:v:3:y:2023:i:1:id:3045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/vetmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.