Author
Listed:
- Pan Lindawaty Suherman Sewu
(Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia)
- Tresnawati
(Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia; Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Australia)
- Callista Rachelia
(Undergraduate Program, Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia)
Abstract
Franchising is a system of marketing goods and services and technology, which is based on closed and continuous cooperation between independent actors (meaning the franchisor and individual franchisee) and is separated both legally and financially, where the franchisor grants rights to the individual’s franchisee and imposes an obligation to carry out its business following the franchisor’s concept. The franchise business that is currently going viral is the Mixue franchise, which offers luxury ice cream at very cheap prices. Mixue became a franchise that had very rapid growth during the 2020 pandemic. In the 2020–2023 period, its outlets reached 1000 in Indonesia. So it is called the angel that takes away empty shophouses because the rapid development of Mixue also helps the property business. Even though it targets third and fourth-ranked cities, Mixue dominates provincial capitals in Indonesia. Mixue’s phenomenal success in Indonesia, after having had great success in Vietnam since 2018, has caused Mixue to expand to Singapore, South Korea, and Japan. In this research, the author will analyze the franchise laws from a legal perspective and compare them with those of the three countries, which may be a factor in the success of the Mixue franchise, which was previously achieved in Indonesia and Vietnam. This research is normative juridical research that uses secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, namely various relevant laws and regulations, and secondary legal materials, namely books and legal literature. The approaches used are statutory and conceptual. Results from research are hoped to provide one-stop article input for entrepreneurs, businesspeople, and legal academics regarding the comparison of franchise law, especially in Singapore, South Korea, and Japan, which Indonesia and Vietnam also complement.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:politi:v:3:y:2024:i:2:id:8126
DOI: 10.24018/ejpolitics.2024.3.2.126
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:politi:v:3:y:2024:i:2:id:8126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.