IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejbio0/v2y2021i5id17286.html

Comparison of Bis NEG-D and API 20E for the Identification of Gram-negative Bacilli in the Laboratory of the University Hospital of Befelatanana Antananarivo Madagascar

Author

Listed:
  • Zafindrasoa Domoina Rakotovao-Ravahatra

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Lalaina Rahajamanana

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Lalaina Rakotondraoelina

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Laurent Raskine

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Saïda Rasoanandrasana

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Christian Rafalimanana

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Rivo Rakotomalala

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Arinomenjanahary Malalanandrianina Rakotoarisoa

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Lalatiana Valisoa Andriambelo

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Hoby Tantelinirimiarana

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Jocia Fenomanana

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Irène Rakotoniaina

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Zakasoa Ravaoarisaina

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Ainamalala Catherine Razafindrakoto

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Tsiriniaina Ramavoson

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Eddy Ramaminiaina

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Heritiana Randrianary

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Andry Tiana Razafinikasa

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Jean Emile Ravelomandranto

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

  • Andriamiadana Luc Rakotovao

    (University of Antananarivo, Madagascar)

Abstract

In medical analysis laboratories, techniques for identifying bacteria are currently becoming more and more numerous. The objective of this study is to compare the 2 bacterial identification systems Bis NEG-D and Api 20E for the identification of gram-negative bacilli. This is a qualitative evaluation of the Bis NEG-D compared to the gold standard Api 20E. During the study period, 32 Gram-negative bacilli isolates were identified simultaneously using Api 20E and Bis NEG-D. The samples are represented by 12 (37.5%) blood samples for blood culture, 12 (37.5%) urine samples for cytobacteriological examination of the urine, 06 (18.8%) pus samples for bacteriological examination of pus, a sample of the cerebrospinal fluid (3.1%) and a vaginal sample (3.1%).The bacteria identified were represented by Enterobacter spp, Escherichia col,i Klebsiella pneumonia, Shigella spp, Salmonella typhi, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas spp, Proteus mirabilis, Raoultella ornithinolytica and Bukholderia cepacia. This study showed a concordance of 90.6% (29/32) and a discordance of 9.4% (3/32) between the results of Api 20E and Bis NEG-D. Concerning the probability scores, they vary between 95% to 100% for Api 20E and between 79.3% to 100% for Bis NEG-D. This study also compared the pros and cons of using Api 20 E and Bis NEG-D. The Bis-NEG-D is valid and can be used by medical analysis laboratories like the Api 20E, especially if these laboratories do not need to perform a lot of bacterial identification tests.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:epw:ejbio0:v:2:y:2021:i:5:id:17286
DOI: 10.24018/ejbio.2021.2.5.286
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbio/article/view/17286
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbio/article/download/17286/4203
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejbio.2021.2.5.286?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbio0:v:2:y:2021:i:5:id:17286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbio .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.