Author
Listed:
- G. D. D. K. Gunasena
(University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka)
- B. G. E. T. Jayashantha
(ORANA Sri Lanka Liaison Office, Sri Lanka)
- D. G. N. S Senevirathne
(University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka)
Abstract
In this study, in-vitro antibacterial activity of four different concentrations (0.00%, 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.15% w/v%) of chitosan, a natural biopolymer, was tested against the foodborne pathogen Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 using well diffusion and colony counting methods. The organism showed the highest sensitivity to 1.50% chitosan, while the antibacterial effect was raised with increasing concentration of chitosan in the medium. Microbiological testing of randomly selected village chicken egg samples obtained from a market in Kiribathgoda, Sri Lanka revealed high cell counts of S. aureus greater than 5 log CFU/ mL, which exceeded the maximum accepted limit (3 log CFU/ g) that should be present in poultry based raw products according to SLS 1161:2003 guidelines, indicating a potential risk for presence of preformed Staphylococcal enterotoxins in these eggs. Therefore, a sample containing randomly selected, 90, six-pooled eggs from the same source was used to investigate the in-vivo antibacterial efficacy of 1.50% chitosan (coated on the surface of eggshells) against this pathogen. Both chitosan coated eggs and chitosan non-coated eggs (except raw eggs) were externally inoculated from ~ 5 log CFU/ mL of the bacterial inoculum and monitored for 28 days, where it showed a bacteriostatic activity with 4 log CFU/ mL and 3 log CFU/ mL fold growth reductions compared to chitosan non-coated eggs and raw eggs respectively. These experimental results suggest that chitosan coating is a promising method to protect the microbial quality and safety of domestic chicken eggs regarding S. aureus contaminations
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejbio0:v:2:y:2021:i:1:id:17139
DOI: 10.24018/ejbio.2021.2.1.139
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbio0:v:2:y:2021:i:1:id:17139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbio .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.