IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/biomed/v1y2022i4id2017.html

An Assessment of Knowledge, Practice and Barriers of Voluntary Blood Donation among Staff and Patients of a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Aondona David Daniel

    (Federal Medical Centre Makurdi, Nigeria)

  • Nndunno Asheku Akwaras

    (Federal Medical Centre Makurdi, Nigeria)

  • Matthew Ngbede Ocheifa

    (Federal Medical Centre Makurdi, Nigeria)

  • Chukwuemeka Nwaeze

    (Federal Medical Centre Makurdi, Nigeria)

  • Laadi T. Swende

    (Federal Medical Centre Makurdi, Nigeria)

  • Bamidele Ohiozoje Ornguga

    (Federal Medical Centre Makurdi, Nigeria)

  • Rufus Ifechukwu Izeji

    (Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria)

Abstract

Background: Blood and blood products are essential resources in the management of many health conditions. It has been tasking to achieve complete reliance on voluntary unpaid blood donors. Hence, assessing the knowledge, practices and barriers of voluntary blood donation can impact on improvement of the number of voluntary blood donors. Aim: To assess the knowledge, practice, and barriers of voluntary blood donation among the participants. Method: A cross sectional descriptive study was carried out using pre-tested interviewer administered questionnaire administered to 288 participants selected by systematic random sampling technique. The data was analysed using SPSS version 20. Results: The mean age of the respondents was 38.81±11.67. Males were slightly more (51.70%) than females (n=149, 51.70%). Most were married (n=204, 70.80%), of the Tiv tribe (n=160, 55.60%) and were Christians (n=263, 91.30). Over half had tertiary education (n=113, 55.20%), were civil servants (n=159, 55.20%) and worked in non-health related disciplines (n=168, 58.30%) respectively. Over two-third reside in rural areas (n=206, 71.50%). 0nly 30.56% had good knowledge scores. Those who had ever voluntarily donated blood made up 11.1%. Females were less likely to donate blood (aOR=0.19, CI 0.08 – 0.48, p=0.00). Those with tertiary education were nearly six times more likely to have donated blood (aOR=5.92, CI 1.66 – 21.10, p=0.01). Those with non-health related jobs (aOR=0.00, CI 0.06 – 0.46, p=0.00) were less likely to donate blood. The most common reason for deferral was viral infections (37.50%) such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV infection. The commonest barriers of voluntary blood donation fear of blood being sold for rituals (22.6%), fear (22.9) fear of needle prick (16.7%).

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:epw:biomed:v:1:y:2022:i:4:id:2017
DOI: 10.24018/ejbiomed.2022.1.4.17
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbiomed/article/view/2017
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbiomed/article/download/2017/471
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejbiomed.2022.1.4.17?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:biomed:v:1:y:2022:i:4:id:2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbiomed .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.