IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/paresc/v99y2020i3p683-703.html

Analytical framework for ex†post evaluation of transport projects: Lessons learnt on retrospective CBA

Author

Listed:
  • Vignetti, Silvia
  • Giffoni, Francesco
  • Pancotti, Chiara
  • Pagliara, Francesca

Abstract

This study deals with the ex†post evaluation of ten major transport projects which were co†financed by the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund in the period 2000–2013 and located across nine EU Member States. The original contribution of this study is represented by the combination of the traditional ex†post Cost–Benefit approach with a qualitative analysis. Specifically, a retrospective Cost–Benefit analysis is used to quantify the benefits and costs of the projects, then interviews to relevant stakeholders were carried out. Ex†post CBA, when appropriately implemented and integrated with qualitative evidence, represents a powerful tool for supporting decision†making processes and for policy lessons.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:eee:paresc:v:99:y:2020:i:3:p:683-703
DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12501
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056819023011478
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/pirs.12501?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

for a different version of it.

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:paresc:v:99:y:2020:i:3:p:683-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/papers-in-regional-science .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.