IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/southh/2025v4a157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic utility of transthoracic ultrasound in chest trauma versus chest radiography

Author

Listed:
  • Johamelis Jaimes
  • Tiwskarys Chalo
  • Javier Moya
  • María Victoria Méndez

Abstract

The general objective: To determine the diagnostic utility of transthoracic ultrasound in comparison with chest x-ray in patients with thoracic trauma in the surgical emergency of the Central Hospital of Maracay during the period 2023-2024. Materials and Methods: A quantitative research was carried out under the clinical-epidemiological modality of descriptive, non-experimental, observational, prospective and longitudinal type. The study population consisted of 32 patients over 10 years of age, of both sexes, with chest pain and diagnosed with thoracic trauma. Results: The average age of the patients was 38.15 years (±15.27), with a male predominance (84.38%). Most of the patients came from the state of Aragua (71.88%). The most common clinical manifestations were chest pain (100%) and dyspnea (43.75%). The leading causes of trauma included motorcycle-vehicle collisions (25%) and vehicle-to-vehicle collisions (9.38%). Transthoracic ultrasound detected pneumothorax in 28.13% of cases and pleural effusion in 18.75%, with sensitivities and specificities higher than those of chest x-ray. In addition, a high concordance was found in the detection of rib fractures and interstitial patterns. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that transthoracic ultrasound is an effective and superior diagnostic tool compared to chest x-ray for the detection of pulmonary pathologies in patients with thoracic trauma. Its routine implementation in surgical emergencies can significantly improve the diagnosis and management of these injuries, reducing morbidity and mortality. It is recommended that medical personnel be trained in the use of transthoracic ultrasound and consider its integration into trauma management protocols in emergencies.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:southh:2025v4a157
DOI: 10.56294/shp2025294
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:southh:2025v4a157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://shp.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.