IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/southh/2024v3a51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of contrast agents on renal function: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Aline Aparecida Pacheco
  • Analía Claudia Sabattini

Abstract

Background: Radiological contrast agents are essential for obtaining accurate medical images; however, their use carries a significant risk of nephrotoxicity, a complication that can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review aims to assess the impact of iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents on kidney function, comparing their relative risk of inducing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Objectives: To evaluate the impact of radiological contrast agents on renal function. Material and methods: A systematic review of the literature available in databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted. Observational studies controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews published between 2009 and 2024 that evaluated the impact of iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents in adult patients undergoing imaging studies were included. Results: The review indicated that the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) varies according to the type of contrast agent and patient conditions. In populations without risk factors, the incidence of CIN was low, while in patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes, the incidence was significantly higher (up to 12%). No significant differences were observed between iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents in terms of CIN risk. In patients with renal insufficiency, proper hydration, combined with other measures such as the use of nitrates, was highlighted as the most effective preventive strategy. There was no clear benefit of N-acetylcysteine in reducing CIN. Overall, intravenous hydration remains the key preventive measure to reduce CIN risk. Conclusion: The literature review indicates the need for more rigorous clinical trials to assess the efficacy and safety of different contrast agents. It highlights the importance of a thorough assessment of individual risk factors to minimize nephrotoxicity in patients undergoing contrast-based procedures.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:southh:2024v3a51
DOI: 10.56294/shp2024121
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:southh:2024v3a51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://shp.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.