IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/sicomu/2025v3a56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of sepsis or septic shock

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Talarico Carreira
  • Anibal Danilo Farias

Abstract

Introduction: sepsis and septic shock are currently a serious public health problem, as it is a disease with a high rate of complications and because it is one of the main causes of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). In addition, in recent decades the number of patients diagnosed with sepsis is growing every year. Objectives: to determine whether the implementation of corticosteroids in the basic treatment of patients who are in sepsis or suffering from septic shock brings benefits or harms. Method: this systematic review is based on a thorough search in the Medline (Pubmed) and Google Scholar databases, the analysis of the publications was chosen between the years 2010 to 2024. Result: according to the evidence found in the 20 articles reviewed, the use of corticosteroid therapy reduces the time in some patients who are in shock, mainly those who do not respond adequately to conventional vasopressin fluids and drugs. However, it is still under discussion whether these data can be interpreted as beneficial for patients in terms of mortality. And whether the benefits are the same for septic patients given the potential risks that corticosteroids cause to the immune system and the hyperglycemia evidenced in some studies. Conclusion: The results of the systematic review and the cohort studies analyzed suggest that there are still many disagreements on the matter, but most recommend the use of corticosteroid therapy as part of the treatment of patients with septic shock and not in sepsis.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a56
DOI: 10.62486/sic2025110
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sic.ageditor.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.