IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/sicomu/2025v3a3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resnet for blood sample detection: a study on improving diagnostic accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Arepalli Gopi
  • L.R Sudha
  • Joseph S Iwin Thanakumar

Abstract

Automated blood cell analysis plays a crucial role in medical diagnostics, enabling rapid and accurate assessment of a patient's health status. In this paper, we provide a unique technique for detecting and classifying WBCs,RBCs, and platelets inside blood smear pictures using ResNet (Residual Neural Network), a deep learning architecture. Because of its capacity to efficiently train very deep neural networks while minimizing the vanishing gradient problem, the ResNet architecture has exhibited excellent performance in a variety of image recognition applications. Leveraging the power of ResNet, we developed a multi-class classification model capable of distinguishing between WBCs, RBCs, and platelets within microscopic images of blood smears. Our methodology involved preprocessing the blood smear images to enhance contrast and remove noise, followed by image segmentation to isolate individual blood cells and platelets. The segmented images were then used to train and fine-tune a ResNet model, utilizing a large annotated dataset of labeled blood cell images. The trained model exhibited remarkable accuracy in identifying and classifying different blood cell types, even in the presence of overlapping cells or artifacts. We extensively tested our suggested technique, on a range of blood smear images to evaluate its performance. The findings demonstrated that ResNet effectively identifies and categorizes WBCs, (RBCs) and platelets. When compared to methods our approach showcased superior accuracy, robustness and generalization capabilities. After training the model with the Resnet algorithm we got 92% of Accuracy.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a3
DOI: 10.62486/sic2025193
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:sicomu:2025v3a3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sic.ageditor.org/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.